I'm beginning to become disillusioned with these things. We're replacing like 1000s of jobs with a system that will almost certainly do a worse job than before. And the money is split between hospital shareholders and VC.
I get that there's an efficiency (market) gain here. But these AI startups that target existing sector automations seem like they're most just attempting to drive wealth inequality in a period of already terrible westh inequality.
1. If we perform worse, we won't deliver any value to the owner and we'll soon be out of a business
2. It's our bet that AI agents can actually perform these monotonous, detailed tasks very well and that this will free up humans to take on higher value work.
3. That higher value work being: calling patients, educating them, helping facilitate patient care. This is ultimately the work the owners we talk to are excited for their teams to take on!
To minimize risk, we implement safeguards to prevent hallucinations, and our system is built to flag potential missing or unclear information rather than override clinical judgment.
To your latter question, we’ve spoken with many hospital networks using Epic that would benefit significantly from our software. However, integrating with larger EHRs is notoriously labor-intensive, so for now, we’re prioritizing more accessible clinics.