Readit News logoReadit News
another-dave commented on 10 Years of Let's Encrypt   letsencrypt.org/2025/12/0... · Posted by u/SGran
vbezhenar · 7 days ago
My experience was: get 3-year certificate for free, install it and forget about it. With LetsEncrypt, it's always pain, expired websites everywhere. Too bad that american IT mafia put these good CA out of business.
another-dave · 7 days ago
Literally all you have to do is configure a cronjob to renew the cert?

I've got a website I build for a friend running that I haven't touched in 5 years TLS-wise, never had any issues.

another-dave commented on Accenture dubs 800k staff 'reinventors' amid shift to AI   theguardian.com/business/... · Posted by u/n1b0m
didgeoridoo · 16 days ago
Perhaps that’s the point.
another-dave · 16 days ago
From a _consultancy_ it feels a bit on the nose. Do you have a system that's mostly working at the moment? We'll migrate that at huge cost to something else (for little upside, but it'll get sold in really well to senior management)
another-dave commented on Show HN: Glasses to detect smart-glasses that have cameras   github.com/NullPxl/banray... · Posted by u/nullpxl
fennecfoxy · 19 days ago
If I want to record you, you'd never know.

https://www.dpreview.com/news/4272574802/omnivision-has-crea...

So all the people blathering about camera in public have a moot point. All the whining does is prevent the fairly obvious camera being put into devices.

But if someone wants to record you in public otherwise, they will and there's nothing you or any of us can do about it.

another-dave · 19 days ago
I think your point is a little black-and-white — there's tons of behaviour that sits in the "technical possible but frowned upon" bucket.

It's like people listening to music without any headphones on the train — technically has been possible for ages but previously would've gotten you told to turn it off. Now it barely gets a raised eyebrow.

Can you prevent people secretly filming you? No, but most people still don't want it be become accepted behaviour, even if to you that's all just "whining and blathering".

another-dave commented on Can you take an ox to Oxford?   alexwlchan.net/2025/ox-in... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
EliteGadget · 20 days ago
> Surprisingly, UK legislation doesn’t define “mechanically propelled”. Lawyers usually define everything, even words that seem obvious.

The terminology is self explanatory. Therefore it does not need any further explanation even for legal purposes. Also generally smart ass workarounds don't work with the magistrate and/or courts.

another-dave · 20 days ago
You say that, but "mechanically" in the dictionary gives "In a mechanical manner."

"Mechnical" gives "Of or relating to machines or tools."

"Machine" gives "A device consisting of fixed and moving parts that modifies mechanical energy and transmits it in a more useful form." and "A system or device for doing work, as an automobile or jackhammer, together with its power source and auxiliary equipment."

An ox & cart fits the bill for "machine" with that lens. Not sure it's a smart-alec workaround, any more than the likes of McVities arguing the biscuits vs cakes in court for Jaffa Cakes. Anything not defined is fair game.

another-dave commented on Show HN: Pooshit – Sync local code to remote Docker containers    · Posted by u/marktolson
mhuffman · 3 months ago
Useful project. Name that no reasonable company would allow IT department to use. 10 out of 10! It worked for CockroachDB. I hope it turns into a unicorn and I'm not joking about that.
another-dave · 3 months ago
I can't remember what the package was, but when I was working for "large bank", one of the npm dependencies we wanted to use had a licence file that just said 'Do whatever the fuck you want'.

Legal came back saying that it was "highly unorthodox, but approved for use"

another-dave commented on How can England possibly be running out of water?   theguardian.com/news/ng-i... · Posted by u/xrayarx
krona · 3 months ago
My point is the differences you're postulating are a rounding error in the scale of the problem in front of you.
another-dave · 3 months ago
> Taken together, the fall in shareholders' investment and retained earnings - or profit - and rising dividend payments mean that, according to the University of Greenwich, owners have withdrawn £85.2bn. > > — BBC (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw4478wnjdpo)

It might be a rounding error vs the scale of investment needed for water, but that investment is needed regardless of public or private ownership.

It's not a rounding error in terms of gov investment elsewhere — imagine an extra £85bn invested in, say, social housing? Even as a single one-off

another-dave commented on How can England possibly be running out of water?   theguardian.com/news/ng-i... · Posted by u/xrayarx
krona · 3 months ago
> I think the neglect and failure to invest in infrastructure is the worst

Cumulative capital investment by water companies in England and Wales since privatisation: £250bn.

The infrastructure they inherited was never designed for the things it's being asked to do today, and it has a life expectancy. It would literally cost trillions to upgrade the entire sewerage system.

This isn't apologia, it's just reality. The road network will also face the same fate since much of it was built >50 years ago and has a life expectancy of roughly 50 years. The country simply can't afford to replace it.

another-dave · 3 months ago
I mean, all the more reason it shouldn't be privatised. If it only makes sense to have one of something (road network, water system) it's a natural monopoly, _and_ it's going to require large public investment to be maintained, why wouldn't you in-house the expertise needed to do that and avoid the shareholder dividends overhead?
another-dave commented on AI is predominantly replacing outsourced, offshore workers   axios.com/2025/08/18/ai-j... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
com2kid · 4 months ago
> Speaking of which, could we apply vector embeddings to search engines (where crawled pages get indexed by their vector embeddings rather than raw text) and use that for better fuzzy search results even without an LLM in the mix?

Yes, this is how all the new dev documentation sites work now days, with their much improved searches. :-D

another-dave · 4 months ago
ah cool right! I didn't know that. One for me to check out and understand more. Thanks!
another-dave commented on AI is predominantly replacing outsourced, offshore workers   axios.com/2025/08/18/ai-j... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
esafak · 4 months ago
Why stop there? The LLM can synthesize the results and spare you the work.
another-dave · 4 months ago
I'm talking about the scenario the GP referenced — where if you search for say "holiday" but get no results because the pages only use the word "vacation" which AFAIK is still a problem in regular search.

LLMs inherently would introduce the possibility of hallucinations, but just using the vectors to match documents wouldn't, right?

another-dave commented on AI is predominantly replacing outsourced, offshore workers   axios.com/2025/08/18/ai-j... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
nkingsy · 4 months ago
It isn’t empowered to do anything you can’t already do in the UI, so it is useless to me.

Perhaps there is a group that isn’t served by legacy ui discovery methods and it’s great for them, but 100% of chat bots I’ve interacted with have damaged brand reputation for me.

another-dave · 4 months ago
A chatbot for those sorts of queries that are easily answerable is great in most scenarios though to "keeps the phone lines clear"

The trouble is when they gatekeep you from saying "I know what I'm doing, let me talk to someone"

u/another-dave

KarmaCake day1426January 7, 2014
About
http://stackoverflow.com/users/1474421/anotherdave https://github.com/another-dave

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/anotherdave; my proof: https://keybase.io/anotherdave/sigs/_k6RGHSRbF90qKa58ejkKAbyWJTd2qQqeMjsx-BBmTY ]

View Original