Financial services, government departments (including things like criminal cases), healthcare - talk about a privacy and confidentiality nightmare.
It should be interesting to hear the inside story about how this was championed inside the company and how it got the greenlight from the higher ups.
I think that is something that needs to be talked about much more. I'm not an economist so not sure how things like that are addressed. Anti-trust enforcement? I honestly don't know but I'm sure there are more informed readers in HN that can comment.
Even crazier. The Post Office just recently lowered(!) the amount of money they allocated for compensations: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67784706
They basically allocated a pot of money to pay the people they have harmed off. But these people had to actively go out and request their conviction to be overturned. Which of course many people were reluctant to do, since it means they would be upturning their life again, and going to court and finding lawyers and etc. They understandably have very little trust in the system. So Post Office just shrugged and decided they don't need to keep that much money around.
Not sure how the legal authorities work in the UK but people have to be held accountable, regardless of political party. One would think the government's legal authorities have to act on behalf of the citizens not just in holding persons criminally responsible but also compensating victims.
https://democracyforsale.substack.com/p/tory-donor-fujitsu-p...
https://www.google.com/finance/quote/BA:NYSE?sa=X&ved=2ahUKE...
Not sure what any President could do without control of Congress and passing legislation against millions in lobbying by corporations.
https://thehill.com/business/economy/4057722-greedflation-is...