Even if the majority of citizens agreed that forcing their morality on the minority is the right thing to do I still disagree because individual freedom is more important than majority opinion.
Even if the majority of citizens agreed that forcing their morality on the minority is the right thing to do I still disagree because individual freedom is more important than majority opinion.
It doesn't matter!
If I'm building a personal project, I don't have the same time to curate a full ecosystem stack and nobody in the react system is maintaining those for applications that are put to the side for weeks or months at a time.
As for me, I just restarted a personal project on rails because of its batteries included mentality - it means I can limit the number of dependencies, and they have gotten very good at migration paths and deprecations.
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/main/Gemfile.lock
Just a playful comment - not challenging your experience
Rider is better either way, but definitely better than alternatives on MacOS.
Again, can you provide an example? Also
> Any multiplayer game is competitive to some degree
Is just blatantly incorrect, unless you just mean "One player is further in the game than the other", in which case literally all games are "competitive", including single player.
2. mobile game
3. mobile game
4. not actually pay to win.
5. noncompetitive game
6. mobile game
You see where I'm going. You can't relate "has microtransactions" with "is pay to win". They're different.
Infinite individual freedom doesn't exist, it stops where others' individual freedom starts.
What defines harm? Or more specifically, who?