Readit News logoReadit News
alance commented on Using extended attributes to tag files   alexlance.blog/tagging.ht... · Posted by u/alance
sureglymop · 14 hours ago
So you're telling me my size 0 file may unknowingly be a large key/value db? Neat.

The system call to read these attributes is getxattr(), for anyone curious.

alance · 13 hours ago
Ha, it suddenly sounds like trouble.

Eg: one could piggy-back an entirely new file onto an existing file (it might have to be text encoded?).

It looks like the kernel might impose a limit of 64KiB on a file's metadata, but that's still quite a lot of room for data smuggling...

alance commented on Using extended attributes to tag files   alexlance.blog/tagging.ht... · Posted by u/alance
karmakaze · 20 hours ago
I've lost extended attributes of files on a number of systems because they aren't always included by default in file operations. I don't trust everything that could possibly write/update a file to preserve them--common 'safe' pattern is to rename as .bak and write new file contents without EA to original name. Nor do I trust myself from archiving without using the right options in a hurry.
alance · 13 hours ago
Yes concerning. The possibility of losing them between filesystems is worrying too.

One rule of thumb is `mv` will keep the attributes by default (given similar filesystem) and everything else needs tweaking/extra args. There's a section on it over here:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Extended_attributes#Preserv...

alance commented on Using extended attributes to tag files   alexlance.blog/tagging.ht... · Posted by u/alance
alance · a day ago
My recent journey sorting through years of files and categorizing/tagging them with the built-in Extended File Attribute functionality.
alance commented on How I block all online ads   troubled.engineer/posts/n... · Posted by u/StrLght
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF · 3 days ago
> Except my 1-sentence comment was not an AI callout that said: "Hey this is AI slop".

Not literally, but this was the thesis of your comment, regardless of your four words of validation.

> I admit it is perhaps unkind of me to not provide the laundry list of AI-tells in their article

Please don't do this. It doesn't matter.

> what explanation do I owe them?

What explanation do they owe you?

alance · 3 days ago
Uhh? I didn't ask anyone for an explanation.
alance commented on How I block all online ads   troubled.engineer/posts/n... · Posted by u/StrLght
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF · 4 days ago
It's at a point where I just flag it. FWIW, the callouts are against the guidelines:

> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.

Just pretend "this is AI slop" is also in the list. Don't complain about that; complain about the information being wrong or something else insightful. Discuss the conclusions that were included in the article. Assume (also per the guidelines) that the author reviewed the article before posting; they are signing off on its validity and therefore any callouts, AI-related or otherwise, should be calling that validity into question rather than simply saying that a particular tool was used for getting the words on the page.

alance · 4 days ago
Except my 1-sentence comment was not an AI callout that said: "Hey this is AI slop". I validate the content of the article but express personal disappointment in the AI writing style.

I admit it is perhaps unkind of me to not provide the laundry list of AI-tells in their article, but I see their response to me as being a direct lie ("I haven't used AI to write this post, that's just my style") so what explanation do I owe them?

alance commented on How I block all online ads   troubled.engineer/posts/n... · Posted by u/StrLght
StrLght · 4 days ago
Author here

Could you please share what exactly is wrong? I haven't used AI to write this post, that's just my style. I am still figuring it out, so I'd love to hear any feedback

alance · 4 days ago
Yeah not helping you design your next "be more human" prompt.

Dead Comment

alance commented on Ask HN: Abandoned/dead projects you think died before their time and why?    · Posted by u/ofalkaed
alance · 2 months ago
I liked del.icio.us, it was online bookmark sharing, but with actual people I knew, and it had genuinely useful category tagging. I guess it was basically replaced with https://old.reddit.com and maybe twitter.
alance commented on Ask HN: Abandoned/dead projects you think died before their time and why?    · Posted by u/ofalkaed
gmuslera · 2 months ago
Maemo/Meego. I know there is Sailfish still around, but things would had been very different today if Nokia had put all its weight on it back then.
alance · 2 months ago
Worth remembering it was the Microsoft partnership with Nokia that intentionally killed it.

u/alance

KarmaCake day53March 25, 2012View Original