Whatever your answer is, apply that to ChatGPT. It is no different.
If a group of employees wants to band together and collectively bargain, that feels like it should be allowed, but if the company wants to completely sever ties with that group or if an employee wants to be hired and not associated with the group that should also be fine.
I agree that the balance of power is tilted in favor of capital over labor and that imbalance has been continually growing over the past several decades, but it feels like there should be a better solution than legally protected unions. For example:
- Increased relocation assistance for people who need to move for a job
- Improved safety regulations, which is a common reason employees decide to unionize in the first place
- Increased public sector employment to provide more alternatives to those in exploitative private sector jobs
All of these seem like better ways the govt can help workers than legally protected unions.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UT0HX3cO4xLft2KozGypU_N7...
Still working on getting it (or a similar release) working in a Wineskin for macOS. But it works great on Windows 10.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB3tdMDRQBc
But it looks great so you don't really notice it.