Readit News logoReadit News
adiM commented on Probability-generating functions   entropicthoughts.com/prob... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
glial · 10 months ago
Do you have a reference that explains this in more detail? I'd be curious to know.
adiM · 10 months ago
Don't have a reference on the top of my head, but the main idea is as follows:

The definition of MGF of a random variable with PDF f(x) is

E[e^{sX}] = int_{-inf}^{inf} f(x) e^{sx} dx

The definition of Laplace Transform of a signal f(t) is

F(s) = int _{-inf}^{inf} f(t) e^{-st} dt

Hence MGF is 'flipped' Laplace transform

Now for we know that the MGF of sum independent RVs is the product of their MGFs. So if we take the inverse Laplace transform, the density of the sum is convolution of the individual densities.

Similarly, if we take derivative in frequency domain, that is same as multiplying in time domain: So M'_X(s) is the 'flipped Laplace transform' of x f(x) and its value at s=0 is the 'DC-gain' of the signal.

And so on... the properties are all immediate consequence of the definition of MGF and since the definition is essentially the same as that of a Laplace transform , there is an equivalent property in signals and systems as well.

adiM commented on Probability-generating functions   entropicthoughts.com/prob... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
shiandow · 10 months ago
Probably worth mentioning the moment-generating function as well, since it's a bit more elementary than the characteristic function and shares many of the properties. It's also more simply related to the probability generating function, you can go from one to the other with a basic change of coordinates (t -> log(x)). I also estimate calculating the moment generating function to be easier in most cases.

In fact most properties of the PGF come from the monent-generating/characteristic function. Including why the second derivative is related to the variance. The second derivative of the moment generating function is the second moment E[X^2]. The second derivative of the logarithm of the MGF is the variance by definition.

The one property that's somewhat unique to the PGF is how composition relates to drawing a randomly-sized sample, which I can see could be useful.

adiM · 10 months ago
One can also think of probability generating functions as (flipped) Z transforms, moment generating functions as (flipped Laplace transforms), and characteristic functions as Fourier transforms of the respective PMF/PDF. Lot of their properties then follow from simple properties of Signals and Systems.
adiM commented on Antifragility in complex dynamical systems   nature.com/articles/s4426... · Posted by u/RafelMri
adiM · a year ago
Is this just risk seeking behavior (in contrast to risk sensitive)
adiM commented on Server Mono: A Typeface Inspired by Typewriters, Apple's SF Mono, and CLIs   servermono.com/... · Posted by u/yankcrime
pwg · a year ago
Given the emphasis on being unambigious, it is interesting that the capital-eye (I) and lower case-ell (l) are the identical glyph in DP Sans Mono.
adiM · a year ago
They are significantly different!
adiM commented on Daylight Computer – New 60fps e-paper tablet   daylightcomputer.com/prod... · Posted by u/asadm
schaefer · a year ago
Alright.

You are putting together a compelling argument for both skepticism and caution before placing an order for merchandise from the goodereader store. (not something I planned to do)

--

How do you feel about their youtube channel where they review all the various devices in this market segment?

Specifically, have you ever found their reviews to be inaccurate?

Do you know of any alternative source of reviews in this market segment that is as comprehensive or experienced?

One thing I'll say in favor is that they do send their writing staff to the various trade shows.

adiM · a year ago
I found their reviews to be a bit too rosy and not highlighting the weak points of the products properly. But I do not find them to be biased.

The most honest source is Voja's My Deep Guide Channel on YouTube. Very detailed and informative reviews.

adiM commented on Daylight Computer – New 60fps e-paper tablet   daylightcomputer.com/prod... · Posted by u/asadm
schaefer · a year ago
boochiboo12,

Please reach out to the team at goodereader.com and see if a review can be arranged. they cover e-ink and several e-ink alternatives, including other vendors in the RLCD space.

adiM · a year ago
FYI: goodereader has a bad reputation in the eink world. Their reviews are fair but their shop is borderline scam.
adiM commented on Daylight Computer – New 60fps e-paper tablet   daylightcomputer.com/prod... · Posted by u/asadm
boochiboo12 · a year ago
1) remarkable & ratta are traditional off the shelf eink and have to use a frontlight (above the display) which has many tradeoffs

2) daylight actually uses microperforations in our LivePaper display, so we're able to use a backlight, which in our opinion is superior in multiple ways

one of which, is what you're describing! our backlight doesnt affect writing feel or distance from pen tip to display!

(also way better contrast with BLU on with backlight)

3) thats awesome! feel free to reach out if you want to collaborate, we want to build the best PDF experiences out there as we're serious about knowledge work

anjan at daylightcomputer.com

we will share more details about our pdf reader later this summer when we do an official software launch!

adiM · a year ago
Ratta (SuperNote) does not have front light. At least the A6X that I have. I don't think that the new version (Nomad) has a front light either.
adiM commented on Show HN: I made a simple daily word puzzle   triword.net... · Posted by u/triword
croisillon · 2 years ago
not a native speaker, i tried all lifelines and have still no idea what the answer is but i noticed reloading the page makes the 50/50 keyboard different each time.

so i reloaded several times to remove each letter that wasn't there every time... well it looks like there is only the M left and yet the the answer is not MMA

adiM · 2 years ago
'A' can be reused!
adiM commented on Why is everything based on likelihoods even though likelihoods are so small?   stats.stackexchange.com/q... · Posted by u/cl3misch
knightoffaith · 2 years ago
Right - and so the more appropriate thing to do is not look at the raw likelihood of any one particular value but instead look at relative likelihoods to understand what values are more likely than other values.
adiM · 2 years ago
Therefore, likelihood ratios! (Or log likelihood ratios)

u/adiM

KarmaCake day301May 16, 2011View Original