I am not so sure that teaching kids in high school about the various types of interest-bearing accounts or the different markets for financial instruments would be as valuable as simply teaching the basics of how interest works. That way those students who continue on to college can make a more informed decision should they need student loans to help pay tuition.
If this is a problem, I had this notion that stock markets (or the clearinghouses or whoever responsible) should slow down the allowed frequency to aggregate all trades within, say, 1 second, and do the clearing/price setting at that frequency. Surely being able to trade at the speed of 1 second is not a big loss of utility -- for the "legitimate" trading going on.
Can't we stop this timing arms race? Or is the problem I'm thinking of not actually a concern? Are millions of us paying half a cent to these HFT trading firms' profits with every trade, just like the old notion of shaving a half a cent interest off of everyone's bank accounts to make some clever criminal rich?
Site still looks very much the same as it did other than a mobile friendly version available. Great source for various odds and ends. Especially for home science projects.
Robin Williams on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etQeFJ2lbbo
Thank you for sharing the Robin Williams clip, I had not seen that before and found it hilarious and perfectly fitting.
Interestingly, ET is used to treat cluster headaches and migraines.
Are you sure? I did a quick search and came up with this
>One of the rules in Regulation NMS is a new Sub-Penny Rule: “which establishes a uniform quoting increment of no less than one penny for quotations in NMS stocks equal to or greater than $1.00 per share to promote greater price transparency and consistency. . . . In particular, Rule 612 addresses the practice of “stepping ahead” of displayed limit orders by trivial amounts. It therefore should further encourage the display of limit orders and improve the depth and liquidity of trading in NMS stocks.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/sub-penny-pricin...
which suggests the opposite of what you're claiming. Also, I'm not sure how you'd even make money this way, considering that NBBO requires brokers to execute their customer's trades at the best available price.
You are correct that brokers are required to execute customer trades at the best available price aka the NBBO. The issue here is that the NBBO is relatively slow as compared to data feeds offered by various exchanges and many brokers use the NBBO simply to satisfy Reg NMS Rule 603(c)[1].
If price data was able to travel instantaneously then the NBBO might represent the true best price(s). But the laws of physics say it isn't so and orders can be executed at a less-than-best price yet still at or better than the NBBO.[2]
Fortunately, more are aware of this these days including the SEC which released a proposed order calling for exchanges to submit revised NMS Plans for consolidated data earlier this year.[3]
A great summary of how money is made with all of this I highly recommend giving this a read: http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/What-Every-Retail-Investor-Needs-...
[0]: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.612 [1]: https://www.sec.gov/comments/4-729/4729-4560068-176205.pdf [2]: https://iextrading.com/docs/The%20Evolution%20of%20the%20Cru... [3]: https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nms/2020/34-87906.pdf
You'd think, but actually no. That's because it's per transaction, so the accumulated amount is well pennies compared to the turnover.
For example, say you always rounded in favor of the company. That means an average of 2c gain per transaction. If you do 2 million transactions a day that's... 40 grand! yay. Except that if the average transaction is say $50 (which seems kinda low) that means your turnover for the day was $100 million.
So, in short, if you are making a lot from the rounding error, well you're making a lot lot from the actual sales.