Readit News logoReadit News
joseluisq commented on Dave Herman’s contributions to Rust   brson.github.io/2021/05/0... · Posted by u/signa11
Macha · 5 years ago
> > If a story has not had significant attention in the last year or so, a small number of reposts is ok. Otherwise we bury reposts as duplicates.

> > "in the last year or so"

> Not in the same month or even after some hours later.

A year is the expiration date on reposts of items that _have_ had significant discussion. Items which did not have significant discussion, and also did not have a large quantity of reposts already are exempt. In some cases the mods have reached out to submitters and suggested they repost items which the mods felt were interesting but did not catch on.

joseluisq · 5 years ago
Unfortunately this is not clarifying my concerns about duplications in this particular case. I understand about the year of expiration and moderators can reach out submitters but for me is not clear what `significant discussion` means as well as `moderators could suggest submitters repost items which the mods felt were interesting but did not catch on`.

Essentially I still don't understand why some get label as duplicated and some others not.

Anyway, Unfortunately https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html is not clear at all for me and I think HN needs to make it more obvious to help members to understand without doubts or contradictions, which was the case for me.

So I will contact HN soon in order to request an account deletion.

Thanks for try to explain me about it.

PD. Sorry for the deviation of these comments from the main topic here. But I think my concern is already expressed on previous comments.

joseluisq commented on Dave Herman’s contributions to Rust   brson.github.io/2021/05/0... · Posted by u/signa11
Macha · 5 years ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

> Are reposts ok?

> If a story has not had significant attention in the last year or so, a small number of reposts is ok. Otherwise we bury reposts as duplicates.

> Please don't delete and repost the same story. Deletion is for things that shouldn't have been submitted in the first place.

Dupes are not against the rules. You're likely getting downvoted by people aware of that.

joseluisq · 5 years ago
If your affirmation is true, why many of HN users (me included) get [dupe] at first place? In general, Is not the HN intention to decrease number of duplicates? If not so then HN should provide a solution for prevent this, such prevention that is not happening today. Example search input.

Sorry but I'm seeing big contradictions in the so called rules.

Just one example:

> If a story has not had significant attention in the last year or so, a small number of reposts is ok. Otherwise we bury reposts as duplicates.

> "in the last year or so"

Not in the same month or even after some hours later.

> "a small number of reposts is ok"

Well, HN what to prevent duplications or not ?

> Dupes are not against the rules. You're likely getting downvoted by people aware of that.

With that premise in mind, let's continue making duplicate content. right?

So don't misunderstand me, since my intention here is just to put in evidence the same recurrent problem to improve HN. For instance I have also faced the same problem in the past so there is nothing agains rules or things like that, but instead is more a improvement for HN.

The reason because I'm interested on this is because I feel part of the community and this is a concern for me (I suppose for others too). Otherwise I could take the easy and dirty way to just say nothing and ignore the problem.

Dead Comment

joseluisq commented on The Gates to Hell: Apple’s Notarizing   cdfinder.de/guide/blog/ap... · Posted by u/_xrjp
maxwell · 5 years ago
Consumers will go where the apps are: if developers increasingly exit the Apple and Google ecosystems, which seem beset with nearly daily anti-developer actions, the only other option is Linux app development for mobile. The hardware is ready, cheap, and good enough.

"Average consumers" are becoming increasingly technically sophisticated as demographics shift, and of course the two leading mobile OSs are already Unix-based. While they're not marketed as "*nix" to end users, they absolutely were marketed as such to developers.

joseluisq · 5 years ago
Agree.

Probably no so related but your comment remembered me some friends sentence, something like: "end-users don't mind about the technical aspects they just want something that works".

This is an ad-hoc claim and not necessarily true, I know. But turns out that this sentence is trivial nowadays with this such of big impact of technology in people's lives. So users are not foolish, they are every day more aware about software in general. They know what they want and can give you the value that your software deserves so just let's start to tell them more about Linux.

joseluisq commented on The Gates to Hell: Apple’s Notarizing   cdfinder.de/guide/blog/ap... · Posted by u/_xrjp
_aleph2c_ · 5 years ago
Maybe Apple should hire Steve Ballmer, I hear he's available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHVhiybBb1U
joseluisq · 5 years ago
And if someone wants to phone him the ringtone sounds like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zEQhhaJsU4

(bad joke I know, it's Friday anyway)

joseluisq commented on The Gates to Hell: Apple’s Notarizing   cdfinder.de/guide/blog/ap... · Posted by u/_xrjp
joseluisq · 5 years ago
FYI: The original title of the post is "The Gates to Hell: Apples Notarizing" evidencing the frustration involved with the notarization process and which now was relativised to just "Apple’s Notarizing".
joseluisq commented on The Gates to Hell: Apple’s Notarizing   cdfinder.de/guide/blog/ap... · Posted by u/_xrjp
mmastrac · 5 years ago
Notarization has been a nightmare of a solution to a problem that isn't effective. You can get practically as much security by pushing malware signatures to the client without the massive privacy overreach of having Apple archive each and every bit of code that you generate for distribution.

This is just Apple's overreach extended to the desktop. Excessive control that makes developer's lives hell while adding barely any security on top.

joseluisq · 5 years ago
Honestly I never have seen such piece of crap like "Notarization". One of the Apple's failures ever (if is not the most one).

A nightmare (and not cheap) to deal with it as a developer.

u/_xrjp

KarmaCake day1351July 5, 2016View Original