Leaky pipe ? It's not a bug, it's a feature!
Readit News_ache_ commented on AGENTS.md – Open format for guiding coding agents agents.md/... · Posted by u/ghuntley
Context is not infinite. Saving context for what matters is key in working with LLMs.
Context is not infinite yet.
New standard for something that maybe false very soon is just a bad idea.
_ache_ commented on Emacs as your video-trimming tool xenodium.com/emacs-as-you... · Posted by u/xenodium
All of your links to your own posts in your blog seem to be broken -- relative links need a "/" at the beginning, I think?
It's odd. There multiples problems on that blog.
https://xenodium.com/emacs-as-your-video-trimming-tool/
Is fixed and also fix various typo in the blog post. Bbut has other bugs, for example, the title link redirect to the bugged URL.
But (the bugged URL):
https://xenodium.com/emacs-as-your-video-trimming-tool Have the problems with relative links you talked about.
_ache_ commented on "Remove mentions of XSLT from the html spec" github.com/whatwg/html/pu... · Posted by u/troupo
This is actually not a bad idea. Why should the browser contain a specific template engine, like XSLT, and not Jinja for example? Also it can be reimplemented using JS or WASM.
The browsers today are too bloated and it is difficult to create a new browser engine. I wish there were simpler standards for "minimal browser", for example, supporting only basic HTML tags, basic layout rules, WASM and Java bytecode.
Many things, like WebAudio or Canvas, could be immplemented using WASM modules, which as a side effect, would prevent their use for fingerprinting.
I get the point a minimal browser and WASM, but Java bytecode ?! Why not Python bytecode ? Seems unreasonable to me to add any specific bytecode support. By layout rules you mean get rid of CSS ? Sounds also unreasonable IMHO.
And no WebAudio and Canvas couldn't be implemented in client WASM without big security implication. If by module you mean inside the browser, them, what is the point of WASM here ?
Isn't this for the extension of the temporary measure that allowed providers to volontarily scan messages and which does not break E2E encryption?
Technically it for the version of ChatControl of mid-2024 where it was about adding a backdoor to E2E. I didn't find most recent data.
But the current version isn't "volontarily" (you mean unpaid or self-willed ?), it's mandatory.
_ache_ commented on SIMD Binary Heap Operations 0x80.pl/notesen/2025-01-1... · Posted by u/ryandotsmith
Can't see the Website.
I'm the only one with a HTTPS problem here? Bad domain, `art.mahajana.net` instead of 0x80.pl.
If you value democracy, I suggest not to trust any random website you read. Of course the French left (at least EELV/LFI) is not going to support this. This should be obvious if you know a bit what ideas they are defending (them and the others too), which you should as well if democracy matters to you.
Can you explain a little why it's obvious?
Last time I checked, LFI was for and EELV against.
_ache_ commented on Show HN: Wordle-style game for Fermi questions fermiquestions.org/... · Posted by u/danielfetz
It should now be fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience! If there is any issue remaining, please let me know!
Thank you. No other errors. It works. Nice game. :D
This concept originated in China and is spreading. Beware.