Readit News logoReadit News
Zobat commented on Dear Time Lords: Freeze Computers in 1993   graydon2.dreamwidth.org/3... · Posted by u/zdw
mbrezu · 17 days ago
Man, we're old...
Zobat · 17 days ago
Yep, old men yelling at "the cloud"!
Zobat commented on Artist who “paints” portraits on glass by hitting it with a hammer   simonbergerart.com... · Posted by u/cs702
colinb · 18 days ago
Art is only interesting if it elicits an emotional response in the viewer. Otherwise it is illustration.

And the wonder of it is that we can all have different responses to the same thing. (The Mona Lisa is a waste of canvas and oil - a hill I will die on).

Zobat · 18 days ago
> The Mona Lisa is a waste of canvas and oil - a hill I will die on

Seems like Mona Lisa elicits an emotional response in you as a viewer ;)

I get what you're saying though. I always "correct" people that claims some piece of music is "bad", there's no bad music, only music you don't like.

Zobat commented on “Car Wash” test with 53 models   opper.ai/blog/car-wash-te... · Posted by u/felix089
Niko901ch · 20 days ago
The interesting thing about the 71.5% human baseline is that it suggests the question is more ambiguous than the article claims. When someone asks 'should I walk or drive to the car wash,' a reasonable interpretation is 'should I bother driving such a short distance.' Nearly 30% of humans missing it undermines the framing as a pure reasoning failure - it is partly a pragmatics problem about how we interpret underspecified questions.
Zobat · 20 days ago
I wonder about the the service used for the test, never heard of Rapidata but if it's like Amazons mechanical turk och other such services there might be a problem where the respondents simply didn't care about reading the question. If the objective for the respondents were simply "answer this question and get your benefit" vs "answer this question correctly to get your benefit" I have no problem accepting the 71.5% success rate. If getting it right had benefits and getting it wrong had none then I'm (slightly) worried.
Zobat commented on Can random experimental choice lead to better theories?   journals.sagepub.com/doi/... · Posted by u/paraschopra
Zobat · 25 days ago
I fully admit that I only skimmed the abstract, but was reminded of an article in Wired about Sergey Brin and his "search for a parkinsson cure".

https://www.wired.com/2010/06/ff-sergeys-search/

He went backwards and started with just collecting an absurd amount of data. Later while talking to a researcher he could confirm years of research with a "simple" search in his database.

Zobat commented on I'd tell you a UDP joke…   codepuns.com/post/8052945... · Posted by u/redmattred
Zobat · 2 months ago
There's two hard problems in programming. Naming things, cache invalidation and off by one errors.
Zobat commented on Survey of developers experiences and opinions of AI tools   sonarsource.com/resources... · Posted by u/Zobat
Zobat · 2 months ago
Not sure what the selection bias for this report is, perhaps that we care about code and believe in the value of static code analysis. Some interesting results in there either way.
Zobat commented on A school locked down after AI flagged a gun. It was a clarinet   washingtonpost.com/nation... · Posted by u/reaperducer
Zobat · 3 months ago
They tried to find contraband, they found a marching band!
Zobat commented on What OpenAI did when ChatGPT users lost touch with reality   nytimes.com/2025/11/23/te... · Posted by u/nonprofiteer
DanielVZ · 4 months ago
I do think we need to be hyper focused on this. We do not need more ways for people to be convinced of suicide. This is a huge misalignment of objectives and we do not know what other misalignment issues are already more silently happening or may appear in the future as AI capabilities evolve.

Also we can’t deny the emotional element. Even though it is subjective, knowing that the reason your daughter didn’t seek guidance from you and committed suicide was because a chatbot convinced her of so must be gut wrenching. So far I’ve seen two instances of attempted suicide driven by AI in my small social circle. And it has made me support banning general AI usage at times.

Nowadays I’m not sure if it should or even could be banned, but we DO have to invest significant resources to improve alignment, otherwise we risk that in the future AI does more harm than good.

Zobat · 4 months ago
> We do not need more ways for people to be convinced of suicide.

I am convinced (no evidence though) that current LLMs has prevented, possibly lots of, suicides. I don't know if anyone has even tried to investigate or estimate those numbers. We should still strive to make them "safer" but with most tech there's positives and negatives. How many, for example, has calmed their nerves by getting in a car and driven for an hour alone and thus not committed suicide or murder.

That said there's the reverse for some pharmaceutical drugs. Take statins for cholesterol, lots of studies for how many deaths they prevent, few if any on comorbidity.

Zobat commented on The scariest "user support" email I've received   devas.life/the-scariest-u... · Posted by u/hervic
kace91 · 5 months ago
>In my defense though, I was REALLY young.

No need to apologize, needing an excuse to lack knowledge is how we end up with people afraid to ask.

I try to make it visible when I’m among juniors and there’s something I don’t know. I think showing the process of “I realize I miss some knowledge => here’s how I bridge the gap” might help against the current trend of going through the motions in the dark.

It used to be that learning was almost a hazing ritual of being belittled and told to RTFM. That doesn’t really work when people have a big bold shortcut on their phones at any given time.

We might need to make the old way more attractive if we don’t want to end up alone.

Zobat · 5 months ago
Totally agree, try to never be afraid or embarrassed of not knowing.

https://xkcd.com/1053/

u/Zobat

KarmaCake day453January 9, 2019View Original