Readit News logoReadit News
XorNot commented on Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition   academic.oup.com/humrep/a... · Posted by u/XzetaU8
pjerem · an hour ago
Sure but it’s pretty easy overdose on paracetamol.

Since it’s a mild and really common painkiller, sometimes seen as not dangerous, someone uneducated about it who is really suffering could easily take 3 or 4 times the dose.

Unlike a lot of drugs, you are not going to have a lot of immediate side effects if you overdose on paracetamol. You’ll just horribly die some days after,

XorNot · 5 minutes ago
This is the definition of building a nanny state. Other people not reading the directions is not my problem when the problem is solely personal.
XorNot commented on Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition   academic.oup.com/humrep/a... · Posted by u/XzetaU8
whazor · 24 minutes ago
This send me into a whole rabbit hole. Mostly children get paracetamol overdose. Then I learned that in US/UK kids get paracetamol in liquid form with all kinds of flavours. Which is much harder to dose correctly when the kid spits or drools it out.

Total culture shock for me, as in Europe the default for children is rectal ingestion (which is probably a culture shock as well for Americans). Any how, with pills it is much easier to avoid overdose.

XorNot · 8 minutes ago
Liquid Panadol flavors were totally useless with my son. He would spit it out or upset himself so much he'd throw it up.

We ended up crushing and diluting tablets in milk, which he would drink (you waste a lot of milk to hit the right factor).

XorNot commented on Tesla insiders have sold more than 50% of their shares in the last year   electrek.co/2025/08/18/te... · Posted by u/MilnerRoute
apwell23 · 20 hours ago
how do these ppl have so much energy. I am in early 40s and i feel like chilling whenever i can.
XorNot · 17 hours ago
They don't run their own lives.

They have people to coordinate their housing, transportation and children.

They don't cook or clean for themselves, they can simply rent out luxury accomodations wherever they land and if an idea hits them at any hour then some person is being paid to answer the phone and figure out what the heck it actually means they should do at 3am when they thought of it.

And then when they turn up somewhere, they talk solely about how hard they worked before someone tells them their next meeting, where dinner will be tonight and here's your private driver.

XorNot commented on Ergonomic errors in Rust: write fast, debug with ease, handle precisely   gmcgoldr.github.io/2025/0... · Posted by u/garrinm
TheCleric · a day ago
This just feels like recreating exceptions, but with more complicated syntax.
XorNot · a day ago
I mean broadly that's my entire problem with errors as values: every implementation wastes a ton of syntax trying to make them like exceptions.
XorNot commented on From $479 to $2,800 a month for ACA health insurance next year   npr.org/sections/shots-he... · Posted by u/laurex
lurking_swe · 2 days ago
I don’t disagree about the overall healthcare system being broken in the US, but I find it pretty funny that you replied to that person with more arguments about how healthcare sucks for the average person… When they were discussing healthcare being excellent for folks with great insurance.

you two are talking past each other, and talking about two different cohorts of people.

XorNot · 2 days ago
The person talking about "good insurance" provided no examples of even what that statement is meant to mean, or what they actually expected to get from it.

Just "the best care ever", no qualifiers, examples and no indication of costs.

Just what does "good healthcare" in America get you, that you imagine people in other countries do not get?

XorNot commented on From $479 to $2,800 a month for ACA health insurance next year   npr.org/sections/shots-he... · Posted by u/laurex
danielmarkbruce · 2 days ago
Unless you have good insurance, and then you get everything, the best, the quickest. Australia is a joke compared to healthcare in the US with good insurance.

Now, the US sucks really bad if you don't have good insurance / any insurance....

XorNot · 2 days ago
Such as? Have you ever had a major medical event using your health insurance in America?

"We have the best!". But like, so do dictators of 3rd world countries. Do you actually have access to the best care? Are you sure? Because about 1 in 10 Americans are uninsured[1] and a substantially larger percentage are underinsured[2].

Meanwhile Australian life expectancy is higher then America[3] (I mean let's be fair: most of the western world's life expectancy is higher then America...I wonder what common trait most of those places have...)

[1] https://www.kff.org/uninsured/key-facts-about-the-uninsured-...

[2] https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2024/01/01/us-healt...

[3] https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/australia-offers-les...

XorNot commented on From $479 to $2,800 a month for ACA health insurance next year   npr.org/sections/shots-he... · Posted by u/laurex
lazide · 2 days ago
It depends on what problem you’re referring too. Many socialized healthcare systems have huge backlogs right now.

Ration on price. Or availability. Or quality.

Eventually, every system ends up with one of the three. Sometimes 2.

XorNot · 2 days ago
"Backlog" - there is never a moment that this isn't just wrong.

I'm from Australia. If I want to "skip the line" I can just pay to do so. Private practice exists. People don't, because it's expensive and they can't afford it.

This is exactly like the US, except in the US you just don't get healthcare at all and die instead.

The "backlog" in any public healthcare system is a triage line. If you actually need care, you get it immediately. If you can live with it but keep it monitored, you might not for longer then is optimally comfortable if you can't afford private consults.

In the US, again, you just don't get anything.

XorNot commented on How well does the money laundering control system work?   journals.uchicago.edu/doi... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
olalonde · 3 days ago
You missed the point. The point was that there are many ordinary and mundane reasons why you wouldn't be able to prove the full chain of custody for the BTC you acquired in 2012. It would be a real practical concern if you are a law-abiding person. If you're a criminal, it's not much of a concern since laundering money is relatively easy.
XorNot · 3 days ago
Yes but the claim is those are hard to track details, and then what's described is a timeline of consistent interaction with the money which you're now planning to claim you have no knowledge of.

And some of those interactions are taxable events - e.g. if you are exchanging out of cryptocurrency denominations, then by US tax law as a US citizen that was a taxable event.

[1] https://www.blockpit.io/tax-guides/crypto-tax-usa

XorNot commented on How well does the money laundering control system work?   journals.uchicago.edu/doi... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
olalonde · 3 days ago
Sure, you can trace the full transaction history of any BTC through the blockchain... but that doesn't prove anything. At minimum, you need all the private keys involved (e.g. not possible if you used an exchange or deposited/withdrew from some online service or lost/deleted an old wallet). Even if you had the full list of private keys involved, going back to 2012, what proves that they were really yours and, like another commenter pointed out, that you didn't just acquire them yesterday?
XorNot · 3 days ago
Which is a more complicated scenario then originally claimed, which was "I bought a $100 of BTC in cash many years ago and held onto it since then". If you cashed out that BTC via an exchange for example, then there will be bank transaction records showing you did but also welcome to "you were likely due taxes on your gains in the interim because it's no longer $100 of BTC - you took possession of much more in cash and later bought BTC again". Which is to say, you were ongoingly interacting with the money at decreasing intervals from the present.

The original claim is easy to prove: it'll be in a wallet which was held for that amount of time. The bank isn't obligated, unless you turn up covered in blood, to prove that you didn't just beat a guy with a hammer till he gives you the password - because you'll go down for that crime by other means.

But very few people engaging in ongoing criminal transactions are going to have a supply of aged BTC accounts to use in trade for goods and resources, and certainly you'll trigger red flags if you keep turning up with a brand new "held it for years" account of $50,000 each week. I mean we know this: because it makes headlines when untouched BTC accounts start moving.

XorNot commented on How well does the money laundering control system work?   journals.uchicago.edu/doi... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
olalonde · 3 days ago
It's extremely simple until it's not. Let's say you bought 100$ worth of BTC back in 2012 with cash at a meetup. Now it’s worth $1M, but you can't prove its origin. You now have a perfectly law-abiding person that risks being accused of "money laundering" just to keep what's rightfully theirs.
XorNot · 3 days ago
Bitcoin literally has an immutable transaction record baked into it's model.

You would be able to point to the timestamp when you took possession of the wallet which would prove providence unambiguously.

u/XorNot

KarmaCake day15667January 22, 2013View Original