Also - he's a narcissist and he wants all the credit.
Also - he's a wannabe dictator, and on his way to making it a reality, so he's demonstrating that he does not need permission or help.
Also - he's a narcissist and he wants all the credit.
Also - he's a wannabe dictator, and on his way to making it a reality, so he's demonstrating that he does not need permission or help.
I guess ideals are a nice tool to compare something against to measure something's relative value. But they can also be used as a whitewash. Maybe the difference is how engaged an informed citizen body is with the government.
I'm on an M4 MacMini, running MacOS Sonoma. It's definitely a little confused, but that could be Arc failing to properly report the User Agent? Not sure. Kinda funny, none the less.
It seems like the AI space is moving impossibly fast, and its just ridiculously hard to keep up unless 1) you work in this space, 2) are very comfortable with the technology behind it, so you can jump in at any point and understand it.
Working != maintainable
The things that ChatGPT or Claude spit out are impressive one-shots but hard to iterate on or integrate with other code.
And you can’t just throw Aider/Cursor/Copilot/etc at the original output without quickly making a mess. At least not unless you are nudging it in the right directions at every step, occasionally jumping in and writing code yourself, fixing/refactoring the LLM code to fit style/need, etc.
I've really only done greenfield hobby projects with it so far. Hesitant to throw larger things at it that have been growing for 8/9 years. But, there's always undo or `git reset`. :P
It's widely understood that Meta, X, and plenty of other companies are collecting, and selling massive amounts of data. Meta builds profiles on people that have never even used Facebook, simply by monitoring their activity across the web through Ads, Embeds and Sign-Up w/ Facebook widgets, etc. This data, if I recall, has been sold many times over, and likely stolen, many times over, in data breaches - both disclosed and undisclosed. Which almost assures that China has it already.
Where is the outrage there? The laws, and fines, there? Why not ban that kind of pervasive data collection and digital finger printing, regardless of where it originates, to avoid the potential misuse of that data?
Obviously a company, like ByteDance, running businesses and Apps inside the US, while also being legally bound to helping the CCP - is cause for concern. But clearly we have our concerns right at our front door - and - nothing? Either or government believes access to this kind of data to be a threat, or they don't.
I know that's a gross over simplification, probably misses some key points, and probably falls under the dreaded "whataboutisms"... but it just seems like, its okay of US companies do it, as long as they give that data to OUR government, and losing that data is a just cost of doing business.
I'll take my tinfoil hat off now. :P
You can't compare a popular bipartisan law to a hypothetical thing you just made up.
Peoples' votes matter
[0] https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/facts-grounding-a-new-...
Glad to see something like that taking shape, and hopefully helping other small businesses (and larger too) get a leg up on these insurance companies. As well, of course, avoiding real-world medical dangers as you've mentioned.
Kudos on launching.