Readit News logoReadit News
Turing_Machine commented on Wild Boar Has Five Times More PFAS Than Humans Allowed to Eat   forbes.com/sites/grrlscie... · Posted by u/Jimmc414
dang · a year ago
Can you please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40812224? It's important and I don't want you to miss it.
Turing_Machine · a year ago
Nah, man, I'm good.

Bye now!

Dead Comment

Turing_Machine commented on Supreme Court strikes anti-corruption law that bars officials from taking gifts   latimes.com/world-nation/... · Posted by u/orthecreedence
rootusrootus · a year ago
> Bernie Sanders has three times as many houses as I do.

He has an estimated net worth of $3M. He is 82 years old and makes $174K a year. Even if he made substantially less than $174K (adjusted downward for inflation) before he became a representative in 1991, he can benefit from compound interest just like the rest of us. Hell, I have been investing for slightly less than 33 years myself and I have a substantially similar net worth, and for a good part my early career I definitely was not making the salary of a congressman. Hell, it hasn't even been all that many years since I started making more than a congressman made in 1992.

It's more surprising that $3M is all he's got. If I keep working until I'm 82, I should be deep into 8 digits of net worth. God I love compound interest. I hope my kids are listening enough of the time when I talk about it.

Turing_Machine · a year ago
> He has an estimated net worth of $3M.

Now do his stepchildren, and exactly how much of their net worth came from Bernie's "campaign contributions".

The way the game is often played is to hire other family members as "consultants" at extremely high salaries (Bernie didn't invent this, by any means -- take a look at how many congresscritters have relatives on the campaign payroll) . In theory, you can't spend campaign money on yourself, but paying it to "consultants" is allowed. And if those "consultants" happen to be relatives, and they happen to use some of their "salaries" to buy luxuries for Dear Old Dad, that's perfectly fine.

Another good one is to set your relative, or even yourself, up in some ancillary business (e.g. advertising or printing). The late Oral Roberts (a TV preacher) was the innovator there. He was always crying about how he sent free Bibles and other religious stuff all over the world, and how many millions it cost. This was absolutely true.

What he never mentioned is that his non-profit ministry hired his very-much-for-profit printing company to print all this stuff.

As far as the government goes, there are pretty strict rules against paying actual government money out to relatives (though it does happen). The rules against paying out campaign contributions are a lot more lenient.

Turing_Machine commented on Waymo One is now open to everyone in San Francisco   waymo.com/blog/2024/06/wa... · Posted by u/ra7
TulliusCicero · 2 years ago
No, it's true. If you're too feeble to walk, you're probably too feeble to drive.

Of course, people who are just paralyzed from the waist down are a different story.

Turing_Machine · a year ago
> If you're too feeble to walk, you're probably too feeble to drive.

Again: patent nonsense.

Do you even know any old people?

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

u/Turing_Machine

KarmaCake day10789May 28, 2010View Original