Dead Comment
Dead Comment
Dead Comment
Dead Comment
I hope society doesn't feel the same way about your needs when they inevitably arise
edit: reduced the tone.
One of the frustrating aspects of arguments like this, is that proponents of "social efficiency" aren't personally impacted their proposed policies. They're quite happy to push for policies that negatively impact others, but it seems unlikely they would pursue a utilitarian policy with such zeal if it personally impacted themselves, or those they love. The impacts of utilitarianism are for others to deal with, proponents almost universally only benefit from their policies.
> One of the frustrating aspects of arguments like this
Is people insisting on making a society-scale issue into a personal, emotional issue?
> is that proponents of "social efficiency" aren't personally impacted their proposed policies
Oh. Well funny enough, I actually do have a couple serious dietary intolerances - but I don't insist on externalizing my costs onto others against their will.
It may be alien to you, but in fact I am perfectly capable of considering policy decisions that are bad for me but good for society. Some people can't do it, I guess.
What all you who suggest it fail to empathize with is that it's the only option most of the time. being completely removed from the social scene of eating out is extremely alienating, and eating out is very common especially for young adults.
So you concede, you look up the menu online ahead of time, decide "hey this probably looks safe, I can risk it"
Boom, you accidentally eat something you didn't account for, try not to make a scene in front of your friends and the other patrons, go out to your car take Benadryl and pass out. Night over.
This sounds completely absurd and hyperbolic, but let's say I took it at face value - why is this an issue now and not an issue when I was in school?