I don't know the best solution for the problem, but CSS is a very convoluted one.
I wouldn't be surprised if the negative developer sentiment toward CSS is reflected in training datasets.
- "GitHub: Let me know when this PR is merged" - "Store: Let me know when this item is in stock"
Unfortunately I think it's only useful if it works everywhere, so we can't rely on every website implementing it themselves.
I'm not sure why it's being sold as an alternative to Nix/NixOS
What a fantastic non sequitur
When my boomer dad complains about the Pakistani family he went to sell something to having 2 BMWs it's definitely racist.
But the racism is inflamed by poor economic conditions, and the rationale is "how come these people that aren't even from here have a better life than me?"
Sadly, people seeking power know this and use the racism to get power and don't fix the underlying cause, which was never immigration — it was wealth inequality.
It's colourful language for sure, but gimme a break.
It's possible to stop developing things. It's not even hard; most of the world develops very little. Developing things requires capital, education, hard work, social stability and the rule of law. Many of us writing on this forum take those things for granted but it's more the exception than the rule, when you look at the entire planet.
I think we will face the scenario of runaway AI, where we lose control, and we may not survive. I don't think it will be a sky-net type of thing, sudden. At least not at first. What will happen is that we will replace humans by AIs in more and more positions of influence and power, gradually. Our ChatGPTs of today will become board members and government advisors of tomorrow. It will take some decades--though probably not many. Then, a face-off will come one day, perhaps. Humans vs them.
But if we do survive and come to regret the development of advanced AI and have a second chance, it will be trivially easy to suppress them: just destroy the semiconductor fabs, treat them the same way we treat ultra-centrifuges for enriching Uranium. Cut off the dangerous data centers, and forbid the reborn universities[1] from teaching linear algebra to the students.
[1]: We will lose advanced education for the masses on the way, as it won't be economically viable nor necessary.
The entire thing is little more than a thought experiment.
> Look at how fast AI has advanced, it you just project that trend out, we'll have human-level agents by the end of the decade.
No. We won't. Scale up transformers as big as you like, this won't happen without massive advances in architecture and hardware.
I believe it is possible, but the idea it'll happen any day now, and by accident is bullshit.
This is one step from Pascal's Wager, but being presented as fact by otherwise smart people.
Many US companies won't capitulate to these regulations. The UK is going to simply be cut off from many social media services.
Oh no! Anyway...