My daughter loves the classics, me, science fiction and fantasy.
(As a donor I tried to sell blood when I couldn't afford rent and food, but it seemed impossible.)
However, not an expert on headaches and can't say if it has anything to do with the migraines in the article. But the point that reducing sugar helps in a myriad of ways, stands and is worth repeating.
It makes any effort to reduce my environmental footprint feel so pointless. Why even bother?
Lack of charging stations is currently the biggest impediment to electric adoption.
Most people take a significant break (30 minutes or so) to replenish themselves on long trips. The problem is finding a place to do this while also recharging the EV. There are some EV restaurants but not nearly enough to be practical on long trips.
Alternative approach --- build specialized, cheap, short range EVs focused on local use. Most driving is short, local trips. Most households with a vehicle have more than one.
This offers opportunity for specialization --- one vehicle for local driving, another for long distance. The auto industry in the US is focused on maximizing profit per car and thus tends toward pricey all purpose vehicles.
Gates was right.
Anyway, we need to start being more specific about what climate changes are happening and when.
Net Zero was scheduled for 2050. Always seemed unlikely.
Yet the far right screams alarmists every time a wind turbine goes up.
The far left screams we’ll all be dead if we don’t react by 2030.
All the news headlines have politically polarized solving the problem.
Nowadays though it feels like the label has a negative tinge; not quite a bad thing, but not something that feels like a universal benefit either. This change probably tracks with the rise of populism.
At least that's my nonscientific interpretation of the historical feeling in Germany since the 90s. But would love studies about it, in general.