Regarding aesthetics, I don't think AV1 synthesized grain takes into account the size of the grains in the source video, so chunky grain from an old film source, with its big silver halide crystals, will appear as fine grain in the synthesis, which looks wrong (this might be mitigated by a good film denoiser). It also doesn't model film's separate color components properly, but supposedly that doesn't matter because Netflix's video sources are often chroma subsampled to begin with: https://norkin.org/pdf/DCC_2018_AV1_film_grain.pdf
Disclaimer: I just read about this stuff casually so I could be wrong.
> In this case, L = 0 corresponds to the case of modeling Gaussian noise whereas higher values of L may correspond to film grain with larger size of grains.
Also, the reason we don't remember PC-98 is because it was never sold in the US (except for the very unpopular APC-III). It was the most popular computer on Japan from late 80s to early 90s and is well remembered there. Being the most popular PC, there is a huge amount of software for it, including huge amounts of office and productivity software, many genres of games, and plenty of Western ports.
Worse as in not compressing as well. As I said, at high fidelity or lossless. At lower quality levels, AVIF files are smaller and JXL files are bigger. At higher quality levels, JXL files are smaller and AVIF files are bigger. At lossless, AVIF is worse than PNG, while JXL is much better.
> Like implied I'm not an expert, I'm just wondering why AVIF can't have faster loading with a preview function like JPEG has.
JPEG is fast to load regardless of its progressive loading feature. So there are really two things at play, speed of decoding, and whether partially loaded files can give you a preview. The slow decoding of AVIF is inherent to the design of the format, but different encoding choices can lead to different decoding speed. IIRC, the lower the encoding quality, the faster the decoding can be. And as for progressive display, that simply wasn't considered when AV1 was designed. You can do something funny and store two AVIF frames, one low quality and maybe lower resolution, followed by the full image, but then you're storing two images just to get a preview.
I think the input lag on the accelerator pedal is what kills it for me, though.
Statements like this make me assume the author of this article may be very young, as in the early 2000s tons of mobile phones and media players had colour LCDs with I2C interfaces, including famous Nokia models such as the 6100. 128x128, 132x132, 176x128, and similar sizes with 4k and later 64k colours was very very common. Some devices could play video on them too.
Edit: there is a somewhat de-facto standard for these small graphic displays and their instruction sets, split between "Philips clones" and "Epson clones", much like the HD44780 did for character displays: https://web.archive.org/web/20150912171758/http://wiki.s1mp3...
ffmpeg -hwaccel cuda -i $inputFile -codec:a copy -codec:v hevc_nvenc $output