Readit News logoReadit News
Savely commented on Apple's Blue Ocean   hypercritical.co/2023/10/... · Posted by u/hutattedonmyarm
Reason077 · 2 years ago
> "Why not no battery in the device?"

How about a nuclear battery, aka radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG)? This would be sealed in (carefully!) and would last the lifetime of the device, with no need for charging, ever. Would need special steps/handling to ensure safe disposal at end of product life, however.

Savely · 2 years ago
Imagine Samsung battery incident on another level!
volemo commented on Apple's Blue Ocean   hypercritical.co/2023/10/... · Posted by u/hutattedonmyarm
webmobdev · 2 years ago
More so when the RAM remains limited on Macs as it too is integrated with the CPU and hence is non-upgradable. This is even worse than soldered SSD, as we can still make an attempt to replace the SSD chips with new ones with careful soldering, but nothing can be done about the RAM. These deliberately irreparable new Macs are just shitty products.
volemo · 2 years ago
You know you can buy other products, right? There’re plenty of computer manufacturers that use discrete modules.
Savely commented on 18-year-old built a computer monitor that doesn't strain your eyes   fastcompany.com/90971739/... · Posted by u/danboarder
post_break · 2 years ago
Help me understand. When a car has multiple trim levels, and one has more horsepower, you would want the one with fewer? Because in theory you wouldn’t use it? And this has nothing to do with MPG either because in some cars the higher power engines get better fuel economy. But based on that metric alone, you would pick the lesser model? Just like if a MacBook Pro came in either 1600nits or 400nits, you’d pick 400? Yes or no?
Savely · 2 years ago
> one has more horsepower, you would want the one with fewer?

Not necessarily, I would choose using other factors. I argue we should rely less on rarely practical characteristics (maximum power / brigthness) and add more day-to-day aspects into reviews and search filters.

There are few qualities usually mentioned along side displays: size, technology, resolution, colour rating, contrast ratio, and max brightness. I think brightness matters less past some point and we really should focus more on traits listed by @boplicity and @dijit (there's got to be more).

Similarly with cars: I don't care about top speed as long as it goes upto the motorway limit, I don't care about engine power as long as car feels nice in real life; I pay attention to size (will it be comfortable in the city and in my tight parking lot?), fuel consumption, interior quality, luggage space, steering sensations.

> Just like if a MacBook Pro came in either 1600nits or 400nits, you’d pick 400?

Well, if the 400 nits one has an advantage (for example it has OLED, so only the letters will burn my eyes in the evenings, not the whole area of the screen) then I would pick that one.

Savely commented on 4K4D: Real-Time 4D View Synthesis at 4K Resolution   zju3dv.github.io/4k4d/... · Posted by u/georgehill
shric · 2 years ago
> What's missing at this point is just hard light

Yeah, "just". Even though we have no idea how to even approach that.

Savely · 2 years ago
I believe the way to go is hijacking neural connections, something between Neuralink and STEM from Upgrade.
Savely commented on Engineered material can reconnect severed nerves   news.rice.edu/news/2023/r... · Posted by u/geox
momento · 2 years ago
> This means that we're soon able to replace our bodies with robotic ones.

Talk about jumping to conclusions.

Savely · 2 years ago
Robotic body replacement is some 20 years away!
Savely commented on Passkeys are now enabled by default for Google users   blog.google/technology/sa... · Posted by u/vdelitz
bufferoverflow · 2 years ago
Isn't it obvious that logging in with your face or your fingerprint is less secure? Sure, it's convenient, but any thug can just forcefully unlock your device.
Savely · 2 years ago
Yeah, because good old passwords are safe against thermo-rectal cryptoanalysis.
Savely commented on Nomnoml   nomnoml.com/... · Posted by u/mono-bob
ororroro · 2 years ago
Getting a good layout is too dependent on the order of definition. I can see that becoming unsolvable for the user for large diagrams but seems ok for small ones. For example the following gives an ugly yet valid layout of the example:

  [more loot] no ->[<end>e]
  [<start>start] -> [<state>plunder] -> [<choice>more loot] -> [start]

  [Pirate|
    [foul mouth]<:-[beard]
    [parrot]--[beard]
  
  ]
  
  [<table>mischief| bawl | sing || yell | drink ]
  [<abstract>Marauder]<:--[Pirate]
  
  [Pirate] - 0..7[mischief]
  [<actor id=sailor>Jolly;Sailor]
  
  [sailor]->[rum]
  [Pirate]-> *[rum|tastiness: Int|swig()]
  [sailor]->[Pirate]

Savely · 2 years ago
We need another tool that would optimise permutation of statements for least overlap in the resulting diagram.
volemo commented on How to type “blimpy” in Emacs [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=2VOnK... · Posted by u/progfolio
cscurmudgeon · 2 years ago
Not funny. Double flagged by click on flag button twice.

If Stallman ever figures out how to watch YouTube in Emacs, someone is going to be in big trouble.

volemo · 2 years ago
What do you mean “if”? https://imgur.com/KsLQxNC
Savely commented on How to type “blimpy” in Emacs [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=2VOnK... · Posted by u/progfolio
tempodox · 2 years ago
Don't worry, people who don't have the emacs gene will be lost nevertheless.
Savely · 2 years ago
Those without the sixth finger.

u/Savely

KarmaCake day47May 21, 2021View Original