You can copy and paste them directly in your ublock config (ublock options -> My filters)
! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21860328
booking.com##.soldout_property
booking.com##.sr_rooms_left_wrap.only_x_left
booking.com##.lastbooking
booking.com##.sr--x-times-booked
booking.com##.in-high-demand-not-scarce
booking.com##.top_scarcity
booking.com##.hp-rt-just-booked
booking.com##.cheapest_banner_content > *
booking.com##.hp-social_proof
booking.com##.fe_banner__red.fe_banner__w-icon.fe_banner__scale_small.fe_banner
booking.com##.urgency_message_x_people.urgency_message_red
booking.com##.rackrate
booking.com##.urgency_message_red.altHotels_most_recent_booking
booking.com##.fe_banner__w-icon-large.fe_banner__w-icon.fe_banner
booking.com##.smaller-low-av-msg_wrapper
booking.com##.small_warning.wxp-sr-banner.js-wxp-sr-banner
booking.com##.lock-price-banner--no-button.lock-price-banner.bui-u-bleed\@small.bui-alert--large.bui-alert--success.bui-alert
Apart from these, I use some additional ublock filters to block some of their tracking that I am not ok with. $removeparam=/^(error_url|ac_suggestion_theme_list_length|ac_suggestion_list_length|search_pageview_id|ac_click_type|ac_langcode|ac_position|ss_raw|from_sf|is_ski_area|src|sb_lp|sb|search_selected|srpvid|click_from_logo|ss|ssne|ssne_untouched|b_h4u_keep_filters|aid|label|all_sr_blocks|highlighted_blocks|ucfs|arphpl|hpos|hapos|matching_block_id|from|tpi_r|sr_order|srepoch|sr_pri_blocks|atlas_src|place_types)/,domain=booking.com
$removeparam=/sid=.\*;BBOX/,domain=booking.com
||www.booking.com/c360/v1/track
||www.booking.com/fl/exposed
||booking.com/personalisationinfra/track_behaviour_property
||booking.com/has_seen_review_list
Note that these may result in you receiving some higher prices by removing some referrer info. If you do see that happening, feel free to remove the offending config if the price difference is significant for you. I usually don't bother for differences of < $10 (price displayed on the search page vs the property page).This means if your alerts are fired through them, you'll peacefully be sleeping through this incident unless your customers wake you up.
This is what I like about Julia's writing - she is frank and tells you when she doesn't know.
"Definitely agree that this could be a problem. Practically speaking - we keep identities anonymous and so employees are protected.
Ethically speaking - if you have a buddy inside the company, they'll tell you how to prep with information the company wouldn't want you to know anyways.
It all comes back to our main point - if you don't have an inside connection, you don't get the juicy insights someone with that advantage does. So your odds of landing the job, let alone knowing what it takes to land it, are always lower. We bridge that gap - everything else in our view is a solvable problem because this engages current/former employees in the recruiting process + helps companies discover more talent.
The summary is that we're fine with keeping it anonymous now and here we have to take a bit more of a disruptive approach. Airbnb and Uber were both illegal (As in literally breaking laws) and still scaled and ultimately succeeded because they believed in the fundamental benefit of their service to the world.
The Lobby is completely legal, just maybe against some company policies, but we feel the benefits far outweigh the cons of some random company policy, even for the company itself as described above."
I feel there are two views on this: From the candidate's perspective, his/her buddy might "owe" it to them to provide additional info which will give them a leg up in the application/interviewing process.
From the buddy's perspective, if they (company/hiring manager) have already decided on one candidate, it _might_ be fruitful to help them get the job, otherwise it would amount to unethical behavior by not giving all the candidates an equal footing.
Before someone asks, the approximate equivalent of WeChat in Taiwan is Line. Don't know what it is in HK.