Everyone non-technical was hired. Everyone with a strong ability was seen as difficult, and kicked out.
They are genetically very similar to Finns, but despite being bi-lingual, and wealthier than native population, they are very slightly duller. (1-3 iq points).
The argument is basically that Prolog is not 100% declarative and that if we jump through a few hoops, and translate it all to functional notation, we can make it "more declarative". But let's instead compare the incomplete declarativeness of Prolog to a fully-imperative, zero-declarative language like Python or C#. We'll find I believe that most programmers are perfectly fine programming completely non-declaratively and don't have any trouble writing very complex programs in it, and that "OMG my language is not purely declarative" is the least of their problems. I hear some old, wizened nerds even manage to program in C where you actually can drop to the hardware level and push bits around registers entirely by hand O.o
I was quite hooked to Prolog in a previous life. Then the limiting factor was the tooling, for really practical use.
Could you tell a bit about your Prolog environment?