Money of which only a small part goes to the creators.
If you actually want to support the creators, do it via a more direct method than paying Google to send a few pennies their way.
Money of which only a small part goes to the creators.
If you actually want to support the creators, do it via a more direct method than paying Google to send a few pennies their way.
>> "The canonical solution is to call these "authn" and "authz", the n and z evoking the longer words."
or we could just use the longer words?
Narcissism is a powerful stimulant ;-)
Ignore the critics. Watch the demos. Play with it.
This stuff feels magical. Magical. It makes the movie "Her" look like it's no longer in the realm of science fiction but in the realm of incremental product development. HAL's unemotional monotone in Kubrick's movie, "Space Odyssey," feels... oddly primitive by comparison. I'm impressed at how well this works.
Well-deserved congratulations to everyone at OpenAI!
Also, if this is your definition of magic then...yeah...
So when some local newspaper reports about some random old person in an old-age home that's political?
Please, take this destructive attitude and reassess it.
Not all things are political and making them so actively makes the world worse.
I will say, however, that the authors one comment "Vlad is one of those people who thinks not everything is political" annoyed me a bit.
I get that for people living in the US it can seem like everything is political but I don't think it is and more importantly, I don't think it's a healthy attitude.
Not everything is political but there are certainly people who will try their best to make it seem that way, usually as a means to engage in politicing, often with unpleasant results.
I can judge the Kagi founder negatively for a lot of things in the post but this isn't one of them and it's a weird little jab to throw in that says more about the author of the post than the Kagi guy.
I feel like the common trap for designers is to put too much stock in tag lines like "Over 700,000 different builds!"
You're dumping a combinatorial explosion of overhead onto players. If all those choices don't significantly enhance the core game experience, you as a designer as wasting people's time. Doubly so if most of the choice space can be safely eliminated by savvy players. The internet exists after all and someone is going to do the math. Why would you gate the competitive portion of your game behind convex optimization problems? Certainly not to make things more fun.
Some examples of these trends are load-outs in FPS games. Every gun now has tradeoffs for sights, barrel, under-barrel, magazine, ammo, etc. and these choices only come after you've chosen a class/weapon. When the core of an FPS is tactical positioning and aim, these options feel like a cheap gimmick in order to milk slightly more time out of players. Franchises like Halo and Battlefield fell for this trap and have completely ruined their reputations.
You can still give players choices that _add_ to the core gameplay like counterstrike does with the round economy. If the entirety of a choice you're giving a player happens in a menu, that should be a red flag. The game design industry needs to less emphasis on statistics/combinatorics and more on gameplay/narrative.
Dead Comment
Google TV and this new device displays advertisements, store, and more. I hate it.
It's the last google thing in my house. When it dies, google will be gone from my house.
There was a setting to toggle. They tried to make it unattractive by saying I wouldn't be able to use the Google Assistant feature but this just seemed like a win for me.
I don't need my TV to be fancy, it just needs to accept signal from my consoles and HTPC.
I do kinda miss seeing all the suggested dogshit movies sometimes tho XD