Readit NewsEither way, Google's transparency with this is very poor - I saw the limits from a VP's tweet
The Gemini 2.5 Pro 05/06 release by Google’s own reported benchmarks was worse in 10/12 cases than the 3/25 version. Google re routed all traffic for the 3/25 checkpoint to the 05/06 version in the API.
I’m also unsure who needs all of these expanded quotas because the old Gemini subscription had higher quotas than I could ever anticipate using.
They lagged in AI, but the new Gemini 2.5 Pro is incredible. They built an incredible tool in NotebookLM but failed to market it
Small guys are the ones being screwed over by AI companies and having their text/art/code stolen without any attribution or adherence to license. I don’t think Meta is on their side at all
Small companies interests are aligned with Meta as they are now on an equal footing with large incumbent players. They can now compete with a similarly sized team at a big tech company instead of that team + dozens of AI scientists
The line connecting NorCal to SoCal is so much more productive that any other line being prioritized is crazy to me.
IMO more about growth of the engineering teams that lead to any specific culture deteriorating.
Unfortunately, 17min to build is pretty good. 17min without a transient infra failure is very good.
Anyways, AMA
There was significant emphasis on code quality at least on the team I was on, and an ever improving culture.
I did work on one voyager task though and I remember it being a nightmare
I have little doubt Apple is going to be a major player in AI, especially in the non-Nvidia hardware space after playing around with MLX
You are still surprised by sama@'s asinineness? You must be new here.