This was pre-gpt-3.5 release. It's classical ML.
That makes it more of a "can I use unsuitable hardware to get the job done fast and accurately enough" challenge, rather than a pure math puzzle of how to encode data with fewer bytes.
I suspect that's why there is only 1 Transformer entry, and to me raises the question whether the rules should be updated to allow GPU's now they are fairly commonplace.
Also, everyone should know if you have some type of online exposure or receive threats you should be able to contact you local law enforcement, inform them of the situation, and warn them someone might try to have you SWAT'd. I couldn't guarantee all police would respect a heads-up call but I've heard it has worked for many in the past.
Those of us who remember the SCO bullsh*t have not forgotten what they are capable of.
IMO, The test equipment required to analyze the results of the reactions is generally most cost prohibitive aspect of this type of 'research'. And this is where I have a problem with these guys: I don't see any plans available for building any of that. Building many of these devices is not out of reach for a skilled individual, and it makes more sense to me that this equipment should more readily accessible than a glorified Keurig machine for drugs. This kind of arrogance and lack of respect for the discipline required in organic chemistry is going to result is someone getting hurt.
Is it common to charge military employees?
I kinda assumed that if you went to war against another country after the war was over you couldn't say arrest a sniper for their kills. Like even during the war, you can capture people but you can't give them a life sentence for killing somebody no?
Regulatory capture I have seen too often e.g. net neutrality getting killed by a Verizon cronie masquerading as a public servant in the FCC. However, from my perspective, it's been mostly conservative powers undoing consumer protections. Unless you mean liberalism in the more European sense, in which case I agree.