Readit NewsThe article glosses over activation functions, which - if non-polynomial - give the entire neural networks non-linearity. A major inflection point was proving that neural networks architectures even with very few layers (as small as one) can approximate any continuous function.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_approximation_theo...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_discontinu...
so, tie content to domains. A domain vouches for content works like that content having been a webpage or email from said domain. Signed hash in metadata is backwards compatible and its easy to make browsers etc display warnings on unsigned content, content from new domains, blacklisted domains, etc.
benefit here is while we'll have more false negatives, unlike something like this tool, it does not cause real harm on false positives, which will be numerous if it wants to be better tham simply making someome accountable for media.
AI detection cannot work, will not work, and will cause more harm than it prevents. stuff like this is irresponsible and dangerous.
So this is in no way a `no true Scotsman` fallacy. Being able to be well read is a product of having intelligent people in your society, people who make hard things accessible, make it learnable, but it does not itself make you intelligent.
There was a time it was reasonable, early space x days for example, when elon was still managable, easily abstracted away and you were able to work with better funding and less red tape vs other options - but modern times i cannot see a reason one would work with elon unless desperate or in the cult, and lets be honest, you dont reason your way into joining cults.
Dead Comment
Why else would they be pulling back?
I hold hope that this is just an expression of humanity in a world where this seems to have become somewhat unfashionable.