At university there was an introductory talk about recycling, where they threatened that a single wrongly discarded piece of trash (uncleaned bottles or food containers IIRC) would prevent the whole batch from being recycled. The obvious conclusion being that if there's even a small amount of doubt about whether something can be recycled, it'd be better not to put it in the recycling bin (and risk the rest of the properly recyclable trash).
I reached out for clarification on various policies - what about bonded plastic + paper, how clean, mixed plastics in bottle assemblies, unlabeled products, etc and they weren't able to answer.
So I'm not at all surprised consumers aren't effectual.
That said, while I want to believe machines are doing a much better, do you have any sources on the recycling statistics? San Jose claims to be an outlier at 74% recycling (diversion rate?) https://www.epa.gov/transforming-waste-tool/zero-waste-case-... - nationwide municipal solid waste looks like only about 1/3 recycled https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-... . If these machines haven't been rolled out, are they very new, or are there some barriers to using them?
Completely free will be abused probably, let’s be honest
I am getting so mentally exhausted learning about a specific problem, and then experiencing the helplessness of not knowing how to push on driving towards some mutually agreeable resolution.
Add in the fact that there is no way to seemingly coordinate the push towards a resolution. Individuals taking action without coordination feels just the same as taking no action at all. Are there any tools to coordinate the push and keep track of progress?
Experimental treatments being available to people with no options (there must be no applicable option with a proven probability of success or this becomes very questionable) could save drug companies millions-billions in the off chance that it proves to be incompatible with human testing or fails to produce the expected effects in humans.
I would take this up a notch or two for patients in a short-range situation that is certainly fatal, opening the door for them to try treatments that have just barely crossed en-vidrio and seem to have acceptable toxicity in mouse models. This would essentially be donating one’s body to science but in a much more useful form, with the side benefit of a slim chance of life extension.
This could benefit humanity by significantly reducing time to market for some drugs and cutting costs on eventual dead-ends.
It’s not the people taking 2 (gasp) showers a day fault, it’s the almond farmers using floors irrigation
You can go to a library to borrow a book, but you can't go to the library and copy all the books for your own use.