No much different from what I did manually when employer outsourced development to India.
Readit NewsFrankRay78 commented on Verified Spec-Driven Development (VSDD) gist.github.com/dollspace... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
> Most people here would not be able to tell the difference between good human and good AI generated writing anymore in a blind test, especially a blend of both. So if the reader often can’t tell
You say that, but I think it's really, really obvious in this case.
If you disagree, you should show us both versions.
I would be happy to, but let me think about writing it up properly and posting it as a more serious piece for consideration.
I just skimmed the article, but I can already tell it's chock-full of LLMisms. In other words: ai;dr
Edit: ok, I've checked your profile and now I see that this is your website that you're astroturfing every thread you reply to. Stop doing that.
I’m seriously not astroturfing, point is serious. Most people here would not be able to tell the difference between good human and good AI generated writing anymore in a blind test, especially a blend of both. So if the reader often can’t tell, why is the source of a well written, interesting piece of writing more important, than the effect of the content itself? I don’t feel the OP made a good argument imho.
If the result is always provably correct it doesn't matter whether or not it's different at the code level. People interested in systems like this believe that the outcome of what the code does is infinity more important than the code itself.