Readit News logoReadit News
Felger commented on Micron Announces Exit from Crucial Consumer Business   investors.micron.com/news... · Posted by u/simlevesque
tuetuopay · 3 months ago
Huh, I've had the opposite experience with the BX500. Hit a bit hard on them and the SSD drops off the bus. Or fill them up to 80% and witness them crawl to a stop. Dirt cheap drives, but don't ask too much of them.
Felger · 3 months ago
I wrote the BX500 ils easier to find than the MX500, not that it is better. Obviously the BX is worse than the MX, having no SLC cache.
Felger commented on Micron Announces Exit from Crucial Consumer Business   investors.micron.com/news... · Posted by u/simlevesque
thelastgallon · 3 months ago
Sounds like an opportunity for Chinese companies to step in and dominate, they have their playbook with solar, batteries, EVs.
Felger · 3 months ago
Gotta love Phison controllers then... despite noticeable progress with modern NVMe controllers, I still wish you good luck.

Or even worse : Maxio

Felger commented on Micron Announces Exit from Crucial Consumer Business   investors.micron.com/news... · Posted by u/simlevesque
RedShift1 · 3 months ago
Their MX500 series SSDs were just king of price, performance and reliability. I even installed them in industrial PCs with intense vibrations and large temperature cycles, they're still chugging along like it's nothing.
Felger · 3 months ago
Agreed, the first gen MX500 with M3CR023 fw proved IMHO to be the second most reliable SATA SSD 2.5" form factor with the Samsung 860 range SSDs (860 Evo / Pro).

Sadly, the MX500 is now difficult to find in western europe. Only lower grade BX500, still quite reliable but not as fast as the MX500 with cache + DRAM.

Had quite a lot of controller issues (become sluggish for periods of time) with the sandisk/WD ones like green/blue and SSD plus.

Felger commented on Micron Announces Exit from Crucial Consumer Business   investors.micron.com/news... · Posted by u/simlevesque
Felger · 3 months ago
Very sad news. Crucial Micron is (soon "was") an great brand for computer assembly and upgrade. It is sad to see the brand rushing to the "easy money" stream. This won't be forgotten when the current bubble will evenually pop and they might meet the same fate as the now forgotten Elpida (who bought Qimonda wich also failed).

The MX500 1st gen (fw M3CR023) was the second best SATA SSD range with the kings the Samsung 860 Evo and Pro. P3 and P3+ were very good drives with great princing for some time, not comparable to the Samsung 970 Evo and Evo+ though.

Never had a failure on about 500 units of crucial MX300/500/P1/P3/P3+/P5. Always updated their firmwares, though.

Comparatively, had lot of sluggish controllers on Sandisk/WD green/blue SATA SSD, and some BX500. But a lot better than any entry level generic Phison S3111 based SSD.

Also very few failures with DDR3/4 DIMMs and SODIMMs. Less than with Kinston and Corsair modules. About the same as Samsung OEM modules from HP/Dell.

Now let's just hope Samsung will not follow in their tracks. I don't see WD-Sandisk going corporate only since they do not make DRAMs modules.

Felger commented on The MiniPC Revolution   jadarma.github.io/blog/po... · Posted by u/ingve
Felger · 7 months ago
MiniPCs...

Have seen hundred of chinese ones fail. More than half failed between 1 and 3 years.

As stated by others, issues are mainly and very commonly with the power stage / power management of the mainboard. Also, soldering quality issues leading to failures.

Far less issues with good brands like Dell and HP (had a few hundred of desktop mini g2/3/4). Even tinys from Lenovo do perform quite well compared to their entry level laptops (also quite bad). Industrial computers form factor are also generally quite good but quite expensive, even second hand ones.

Currently don't have enough feddback on the Asus ones nor enough volume to draw conclusions, but so far they performed well with minimal issue, even with models back from i3/i5 8th gen series.

Felger commented on Why is there a date of 1968 in the Intel Chipset Device Software Utility?   intel.com/content/www/us/... · Posted by u/vegadw
AshamedCaptain · 8 months ago
While it is true that Intel Chipset drivers have been mostly just "display names" for years (decades) now, I definitely remember that in the 9x era they would change some settings related to the IDE controller that would allow for (U)DMA support. It still didn't change the actual driver.
Felger · 8 months ago
The inf update indeed almost didn't do anything beside renaming lots of PCI 8086:xxxx peripherals and I/O spaces.

To really wreak havoc, play a bit with Intel Dynamic Platform & Thermal Framework Chipset Participant on 6th/7th gen CPU, by installing optional drivers updates pushed by Windows 10's WU on many laptops (like HP's probook).

Expect miracles... and a lot of BSOD :]

Felger commented on Collapse OS   collapseos.org/... · Posted by u/kaycebasques
Felger · a year ago
Will it run on my Pip-Boy 3000 ?
Felger commented on IBM RISC System/6000 Family   computeradsfromthepast.su... · Posted by u/rbanffy
Felger · a year ago
I believe the Oracle 8 SQL Server we used at school in the starting of the '2000 was running on a RS/6000 system on AIX.

Nice system, had a good memory from it performance-wise. MySQL was not a serious competitor at that time.

The machine had often overheating issues starting from the beginning of june when ambiant temp rose above 24/25°. We did not have CVAC in the building.

Felger commented on Windows: Insecure by Design   theregister.com/2024/06/2... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
Felger · 2 years ago
Chuckles. Intel and AMD provide ME/AMT/SPS and PSP respectively on their whole x86-64 CPU range, which are embedded SOC : a CPU (based on quark for intel) and basic OS (said to be from Minix 3 for intel as well), nested within the CPU in the way they cannot be disabled as they are serialized to logical CPU init, "microcode style". Add obfuscated code modules, cannot be completely removed whatever everyone could do up to now. It can access to the network stack and has an "always on" behavior once the system is simply plugged to the power.

If you're security concerned, the OS stack is quite a... secondary issue to you.

You will have to consider switching to an open RISC architecture (Risc-V someone ? Strangely enough or not, EU seems quite fan of this on-the-rise-again architecture) AND a linux distribution.

For sure, for sensitive applications, having a cheap, secure and versatile architecture would be better than making DSPs or issuing hardly scalable and pricy FPGA solutions (well, lots of communication equipements' mainboards still uses them)

Felger · 2 years ago
Even though for REALLY sensitive applications (defence and space), DSP stay the gold standard.
Felger commented on Windows: Insecure by Design   theregister.com/2024/06/2... · Posted by u/CrankyBear
AtlasBarfed · 2 years ago
It IS a national security concern, one that worsens every year.

The US government should be investing billions in Linux to harden it and make it more usable and appealing.

So should Intel, amd, Qualcomm, because that keeps their processors compatible with a rapidly patched mainstream os.

So should the EU.

But... They won't. Surely as long as 90 year old presidents are what we are stuck with.

Felger · 2 years ago
Chuckles. Intel and AMD provide ME/AMT/SPS and PSP respectively on their whole x86-64 CPU range, which are embedded SOC : a CPU (based on quark for intel) and basic OS (said to be from Minix 3 for intel as well), nested within the CPU in the way they cannot be disabled as they are serialized to logical CPU init, "microcode style". Add obfuscated code modules, cannot be completely removed whatever everyone could do up to now. It can access to the network stack and has an "always on" behavior once the system is simply plugged to the power.

If you're security concerned, the OS stack is quite a... secondary issue to you.

You will have to consider switching to an open RISC architecture (Risc-V someone ? Strangely enough or not, EU seems quite fan of this on-the-rise-again architecture) AND a linux distribution.

For sure, for sensitive applications, having a cheap, secure and versatile architecture would be better than making DSPs or issuing hardly scalable and pricy FPGA solutions (well, lots of communication equipements' mainboards still uses them)

u/Felger

KarmaCake day124June 21, 2018View Original