In my 40+ years of driving, I've seen such disassembled cars along the road a hand full of times.
In my 40+ years of driving, I've seen such disassembled cars along the road a hand full of times.
Every time I board a plane, I think what a crazy thing I am doing, but then I remember that I could be safe and snug in my house and still be in a plane crash.
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Python, Perl, GoLang, HTML, JavaScript, SQL, Mysql, MongoDB, Postgres, Linux, AWS, GCloud, OCI, Oracle Cloud, Git, Bash Docker, Kubernetes Cloud, Kubernetes Bare Metal, Terraform, Pulumi, Helm, Flask, Networking, Routing, Switching, Load Balancing, F5, VPN, OpenSSL, InfoSec, Firewalls, DNS, DHCP, TLS, Regulatory, PCI, SOX, HIPAA, Monitoring, Nagios, Prometheus, Grafana, Jenkins, Github, Gitlab
Résumé/CV: https://realms.org/hire/
Email: diederich@gmail.com
I am seeking a hands-on, team-oriented role at a stable, technologically innovative company where we will be able to facilitate evolutionary and revolutionary adoption of various technologies, intended to produce consistently growing operational return on investment.
I am passionate about improving operational processes and flows via the collaborative approach of design and architecture. Fundamentally, I am a programmer with decades of hands-on operational experience, ranging from all kinds of Linux system administration to databases to strong networking skills. Collaboratively designing and shipping high availability is my forte. Through many and diverse focus areas, LiveOps achieved 99.99% availability in Q4 2011. Above all, I seek to understand, assimilate and process all of the issues, big and small, that stand in the way of efficient and smooth operations, using that analysis to design elegant integration solutions. Shipping that automation so my co-workers can get their work done is job one.
Unless you are experienced in rust, you have zero ability to catch the kind of mistakes LLMs make producing rust code.
There was still a server, its just not YOUR server. In this case, there will still be servers, just maybe not something that you need to manage state on.
This misnaming creates endless conflict when trying to communicate this with hyper excited management who want to get on the latest trend.
Cant wait to be on the meeting and hearing: "We dont need servers when we migrate to client side data stores".
Over time, the meaning of the word 'Xerox' changed. More specifically, it gained a new meaning. For a long time, Xerox only referred to a company named in 1961. Some time in the late 60s, it started to be used as a verb, and as I was growing up in the 70s and 80s, the word 'Xerox' was overwhelmingly used in its verb form.
Our society decided as a whole that it was ok for the noun Xerox to be used a verb. That's a normal and natural part of language development.
As others have noted, management doesn't care whether the serverless thing you want to use is running on servers or not. They care that they don't have to maintain servers themselves. CapEx vs OpEx and all that.
I agree that there could be some small hazard with the idea that, if I run my important thing in a 'serverless' fashion, then I don't have to associate all of the problems/challenges/concerns I have with 'servers' to my important thing.
It's an abstraction, and all abstractions are leaky.
If we're lucky, this abstraction will, on average, leak very little.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
And accompanying paper:
Everyone in the United States should watch this video, or something similar, on a regular schedule.
As great as the first part is, I actually think the second part, with officer George Bruch, is even more important.
It's not as smooth, it's not flashy. Officer Bruch comes across as just a regular guy who wants to help you.
I've long viewed the world primarily through the lens of incentives and motivations. When officer Bruch is talking to you in a little room, you just want to tell your story, get it off your chest, and he makes it very, very easy to do that. In fact, if the roles of these two guys were reversed, and professor Duane, with his slick and fun personality, was interviewing you, you'd likely trust him less.
Even though it feels like it, officer Bruch is not your friend. He's not on your side. It doesn't feel like it, but his incentives and motivations are mostly in conflict with yours, whether you are guilty or innocent.
I would argue that increased legality IS increased aggression. A person can whack me with a stick or they can shoot me in the head. One is a more aggressive act than the other.
https://realms.org/pics/cnn.html
Some interesting similarities.