(Me, that's who. I now have 63+ GB just under my Music folder)
(Me, that's who. I now have 63+ GB just under my Music folder)
A snippet that could work better in my opinion is the following:
html {
max-width: 70ch;
/* larger spacing on larger screens, very small spacing on tiny screens */
padding: calc(1vmin + .5rem);
/* shorthand for margin-left/margin-right */
margin-inline: auto;
/* fluid sizing: https://frontaid.io/blog/fluid-typography-2d-css-locks-clamp/ */
font-size: clamp(1em, 0.909em + 0.45vmin, 1.25em);
/* use system font stack: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/font-family */
font-family: system-ui
}
/* increase line-height for everything except headings */
body :not(:is(h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)) {
line-height: 1.75;
}
- Miles Davis: In a Silent Way
- Brian Eno: Ambient 4: On Land
- Godspeed You! Black Emperor: F♯ A♯ ∞ (one of my favourite albums. listen with your best headphones. HD650s are good)
- Aphex Twin: Selected Ambient Works Volume II
- Mozart: Requiem (my first proper introduction to classical. I was absolutely blown away)
- Boards of Canada - Music Has the Right to Children
- Sun O))): Black One (extremely experimental doom metal. the musicality of it is questionable at times but it's fantastic to study to)
- Sleep: Jerusalem (occasional vocals but trust me they're not distracting)
- Tim Hecker: Harmony in Ultraviolet
- Bill Evans: Sunday at the Village Vanguard
The worst part about these sorts of things is that 30 seconds after posting I'll remember all the awesome albums I forgot and kick myself for it.Some I'd recommend:
* Ambient 1: Music for Airports
* Ambient 2: Plateaux of Mirror
* The Pearl
* Thursday Afternoon
* Discreet Music
If you like any of those, there's lots more to explore. I don't care for all Eno's ambient works, but I really enjoy some of it.
Which actually seems all the more odd because it does get updated when you move the mouse, use the arrow keys (or other non-inserting keys like Alt+F4)
Have a read down the entire standard [1] with an eye to that. There's a number of codes that are useless (some deprecated), and a number of other codes that I feel uncomfortable calling useless, but compared to how the web evolved, certainly aren't working the way the initial designers intended. 406 "Not Acceptable", for instance, is for when the client sent up Accept-* headers that don't match anything the server offers. That's technically usable, but content negotiation ultimately didn't play as big a part of the web as RFC 7231's text suggests the authors thought it would.
There's a lot of response codes squeezed on both sides by the fact that 1. they're too underspecified to be really useful (yes, it's great that you can return 402 payment required, but where is the browser supposed to go from there?) and 2. had they been specified enough to use at the time they were specified, they would have been utterly wrong. I don't think there's any way to square that circle at a standards level.
One can simply respond with the appropriate redirection code to a login/signup page (or whatever) when the client attempts to access a page where "payment is require" (just like any other authentication/authorization issue).
On the other hand, I've also noticed when watching movies on my computer (which is pretty much how I do it anymore), it can be really easy to get distracted.
On the gripping hand, when I watch shows on Amazon Prime, I generally don't have any difficulty watching through an entire episode without getting distracted. Possibly because I usually watch Prime on my tablet, where it's (a little) harder to switch between apps.
Question: Write the command that you use to move into your home directory '~'
Your answer: cd
Correct answer: cd ~
The man pages specify that cd moves into the current user's $HOME directory if called without arguments, but I'm sure there's some mystic difference between cd $HOME and cd ~ in certain cases.
Yeah, not really fixed: https://imgur.com/a/counting-letters-with-chatgpt-7cQAbu0