Fluorescence is one way to defend against the harmful bond-breaking abilities of UV light.

I suspect in many cases it is simply the biologically cheapest 'sunblock'.

And both deprive the creators of income.

I recommend reading comments like this and substituting "a baby" for AI. A baby also can't be aligned and is capable of deciding to destroy the world. It's not gonna do it though.

I don't really understand either side of the equation here.

So, on the one hand you have people who use ad blockers. The first retort that comes to mind here is: Well, we'll take our business elsewhere. Which is odd because without ads they aren't paying and them leaving is the goal.

Of course on the other hand ... when I read the title my thoughts weren't that I would be okay because I don't ad block youtube. My thought wasn't that I should buy youtube premium to avoid ads. My thought WAS that if I ever get falsely flagged, then I'll just buy a nebula subscription (or whatever) and never use youtube again.

In fact I went over to nebula to check it out.

Somebody has to pay something for youtube to be viable. But youtube got big via offering a free service and now if feels like they're trying to pull up the ladder behind themselves.

It is called Title Case and part of a lot of (American?) news organizations style guides.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_case

It confuses me, a non-native English speaker, a lot too. I hate it.

What is one of those 'really clean' languages that we should be using then?

I'm interested!