Dead Comment
https://mobile.twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1323893513226...
Dead Comment
Let's say Jeremy just walked away quietly in disgust and didn't say anything publicly. What would have they done? I would guess that they would have chucked it under "We did a great job enforcing the code of conduct. Problem solved".
People think speed is the only advantage, reducing runtime debugging and providing a more secure, more correct front end, free null pointer issues and free of memory leaks and runtime type errors - rust just has the added bonus of being fast.
You're right some of the tools aren't quite there and if you move a rails-y app over to rust, you have a job ahead of you to assemble some libraries, but it is doable - the point is that you can put rust in production at web scale now.
Nitpick, but only two of those are valid programs. Two of them use `a` without binding it.
- OCaML has OO cruft and OCaML folks themselves keep telling you "Oh, you don't have to use the OO parts of OCaML"
Well then effin give me an ML that's more modern than SML, and has no OO cruft!
don't tell me "take this stuff that we think is good, and just ignore parts of it that are bad"
(and I'm not interested in Haskell).
edit: Matt Might lists only two other languages [0], Scala and Scheme. Both are not ML (though I think some folks think Scala is an ML?)
[0] http://matt.might.net/articles/best-programming-languages/
Idris or agda for type level goodies.
The push for suppressing entire populations for months and years are coming from those that want to dis-empower these populations the rest of the time.
If by "normal" you mean the neo-liberal/neo-marxist agenda "progressing"... that is increasingly unlikely