https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/02/28/why-ameri...
(This is not a comment making any judgements about cost or the state of the economy, I was just surprised to find it that high)
Their margins are negative and every increase in usage results in more cost. They have a whole leaderboard of people who pay $20 a month and then use $60,000 of compute.
Deleted Comment
Something has to change to move away from these rootkit antivirus like apps looking for exploits.
Honestly given the complexity of the screens involved I feel Figma's performance is pretty reasonable. (Now, library publish and update - that's still unreasonably slow IMO)
As another commenter points out, "not compromising user trust" seems at odds with "money-maker" in the long-term. Surely Google and other large tech companies have demonstrated that to you at this point? I don't understand why so many people think OpenAI or any of them will be any different?
Hideous idea as it is, I fully expect they break even in 2026.
If they can figure out how to get the right kickbacks/referrals without compromising user trust and really nail the search and aggregation of data this could be a real money-maker.
Deleted Comment
Glad to see that they're sticking with open weights.
That said, Flux 1.x was 12B params, right? So this is about 3x as large plus a 24B text encoder (unless I'm misunderstanding), so it might be a significant challenge for local use. I'll be looking forward to the distill version.