Readit News logoReadit News
1GZ0 commented on Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?   infosec.press/brunomiguel... · Posted by u/pabs3
1GZ0 · 5 days ago
Yes, and they've been at it for a while. its honestly hard to watch.
1GZ0 commented on Ask HN: Dark Mode for HN is overdue    · Posted by u/florians
Jean-Papoulos · a month ago
1GZ0 · a month ago
Darkreader plus 150-200% zoom and you have something pretty usable on hidpi displays. You could always try making your own frontend for HN, it's pretty trivial :)
1GZ0 commented on Baby Shoggoth Is Listening   theamericanscholar.org/ba... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
1GZ0 · a month ago
Writing for AI honestly doesn't seem much different to writing for pagerank algorithms which SEO specialists have been doing for years. The only change is that almost all the SEO content on the web is now being written by AI, for AI to later summarise.
1GZ0 commented on Leaving serverless led to performance improvement and a simplified architecture   unkey.com/blog/serverless... · Posted by u/vednig
1GZ0 · 2 months ago
Somewhere in Denmark, DHH is smiling
1GZ0 commented on UK toughens Online Safety Act with ban on self-harm content   gov.uk/government/news/on... · Posted by u/_p2zi
1GZ0 · 3 months ago
So they're going after mukbang YouTubers now?
1GZ0 commented on A critique of package managers   gingerbill.org/article/20... · Posted by u/gingerBill
papichulo2023 · 3 months ago
Sorry but I lack any respect for authors that use clickbaits. Call them put and move on seem the best approach.
1GZ0 · 3 months ago
Its not clickbait though.

You should try reading the article before passing judgement.

Its not like the article is called "5 facts that will make you hate package managers. Number 5 will shock you"

1GZ0 commented on A critique of package managers   gingerbill.org/article/20... · Posted by u/gingerBill
rgoulter · 3 months ago
In the article, the author does say "I am not advocating to write things from scratch", while also describing third party dependencies as liabilities (e.g. security vulnerabilities), that people are too trusting of third party dependencies, that people overestimate the quality of third party dependencies.

I think you're splitting hairs if you're saying that these points from the article argue against package managers but don't argue against using third party dependencies.

I similarly think you're splitting hairs if to consider "package managers are useful?" and "third party dependencies are useful?" as distinct points.

1GZ0 · 3 months ago
Liability: "Something for which one is liable; an obligation, responsibility, or debt."

Third party dependencies absolutely are liabilities. You are liable to vet them, inspect their licenses and keep them updated while ensuring that they continue working with your existing code.

This is not something package managers help you do. Package managers like NPM make it trivial to skip these steps entirely.

What is being argued for, is a more thoughtful approach to handling third party dependencies. Or at the very least, the need for people to realise that there are costs associated with bringing third party dependencies into your codebase.

Its not splitting hairs at all. Its more of an presumption on the part of a large number of readers, that the 2 points argued conflate to "Package manager suck, because third party dependencies suck and you should write everything from scratch instead".

1GZ0 commented on A critique of package managers   gingerbill.org/article/20... · Posted by u/gingerBill
rgoulter · 3 months ago
The title is provocative and attention grabbing. -- It's completely fair game to react to the provocation rather than the substance of the article itself. (Or, rather, it's silly to use attention grabbing rhetoric, then complain that people paid attention to the rhetoric).

I'd prefer instead a more balanced title like "Remember to Consider the Costs When Using Package Managers", or whatever.

1GZ0 · 3 months ago
> It's completely fair game to react to the provocation rather than the substance of the article itself.

Yeah, but its down right stupid to do so.

The title isn't even misleading or part of a Motte-and-bailey argument.

People just hear "Package Managers are Evil" and assume that the author means you shouldn't use third party dependencies. Which is NOT what's being argued.

But I guess you'd know that, if you read passed the title.

1GZ0 commented on A critique of package managers   gingerbill.org/article/20... · Posted by u/gingerBill
smw · 3 months ago
"When using Go for example, you don’t need any third-party libraries to make a web server, Go has it all there and you are done."

Fine, now what if you need to connect to a database, or parse a PDF, or talk to a grpc backend. What a hilariously short-sighted example.

To me, this whole article just screams inexperience.

1GZ0 · 3 months ago
The Author isn't arguing for not using third party dependencies. He's arguing for developers to be more conscious of the dependencies they use, by manually vetting and handling them. That screams "I've been down the package manager route and paid the price". Not inexperience.
1GZ0 commented on DDoS is the neglected cybercrime that's getting bigger. Let's kill it off   theregister.com/2025/09/0... · Posted by u/rntn
1GZ0 · 4 months ago
"let's kill it off" proceeds to offer no solutions.

u/1GZ0

KarmaCake day240June 3, 2024View Original