Readit News logoReadit News
dang · 22 days ago
Comments* moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47096253, which has the original source.

We will add the current link to the toptext there as well.

(* except for the ones that only make sense in current context - that's the intention at least)

hizanberg · 22 days ago
Why is this linking to a blog post of what someone said, instead of directly linking to what they said?

[1] https://x.com/karpathy/status/2024987174077432126

JKCalhoun · 22 days ago
(Prefer the xcancel link [1] someone posted in this thread.)

[1] https://xcancel.com/karpathy/status/2024987174077432126

rvz · 22 days ago
[flagged]
nl · 22 days ago
Simon's work is always appreciated. He thinks through things well, and his writing is excellent.

Just because something is popular doesn't make it bad.

bahmboo · 22 days ago
The author didn't submit this to HN. I read his blog but I'm not on X so I do like when he covers things there. He's submitted 10 times in last 62 days.
odshoifsdhfs · 22 days ago
Hah i didn’t see who submitted it but as soon as I read your message i thought it was simonw, and behold, tada!

HN really needs a way to block or hide posts from some users.

PacificSpecific · 22 days ago
Yeah it's really quite annoying. Is there a way to just block his site source from showing up on here without using external tools?
geeunits · 22 days ago
I've been warned for calling this out, but I'm glad others are privy to the obvious
Der_Einzige · 22 days ago
Thank you for calling this out. The individual in question is massively overhyped.
simonw · 22 days ago
> Most of the time, users (or the author himself) submit this blog as the source, when in fact it is just content that ultimately just links to the original source for the goal of engagement.

I encourage you to look at submissions from my domain before you accuse me like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=simonwillison.net - the ones I submitted list "simonw" as the author.

I'm selective about what I submit to Hacker News. I usually only submit my long-form pieces.

In addition to long form writing I operate a link blog, which this Claw piece came from. I have no control over which of my link blog pieces are submitted by other people.

I still try to add value in each of my link posts, which I expect is why they get submitted so often: https://simonwillison.net/2024/Dec/22/link-blog/ - in this case the value add was highlighting that this is Andrej helping coin yet another new term, something he's very good at.

hizanberg · 22 days ago
So everyone has to waste their time to visit a link on a blog first instead of being able to go directly to the source?

and why would anyone down vote you for calling this out, like who wants to see more low effort traffic-grab posts like this?

Dead Comment

helloplanets · 22 days ago
> Because the author of the blog is paid to post daily about nothing but AI and needs to link farm for clicks and engagement on a daily basis.

Care to elaborate? Paid by whom?

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

Setas · 21 days ago
I've been building managed hosting for this exact category of agent systems. The supervision/persistence angle is what drew me to it.

My stack is Elixir on Fly.io — OTP supervision trees are basically purpose-built for long-running processes that need to stay alive. If something crashes, the supervisor restarts it. No systemd, no cron, just the runtime doing what it was designed for.

The self-hosting path is great for tinkering — and Karpathy's point about NanoClaw's ~4000 lines being auditable is a solid trust argument. But once you want 24/7 uptime across multiple agents, you end up rebuilding production infrastructure from scratch.

I run 5 Elixir apps on Fly for under €50/month, so the economics of multi-tenant hosting work well here.

(Founder of OpenClawCloud — clawdcloud.net — happy to talk architecture if anyone's exploring this space.)

Deleted Comment

dcreater · 22 days ago
[flagged]
dang · 22 days ago
Would you please not cross into personal attacks on HN? It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. We've already had to ask you this, and we end up banning accounts that keep breaking the site guidelines this way.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46715512 (Jan 2026)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45022369 (Aug 2025)

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

dcreater · 21 days ago
I think my comment was a dissenting opinion, not a personal attack. Its troubling that such a comment would be considered crossing a line
bob1029 · 21 days ago
I'm sorry, how was that a personal attack?
thedevilslawyer · 22 days ago
[flagged]
blibble · 22 days ago
Simon Willison claims to be an "Independent AI researcher"[1]:

but then at the top of this article:

> Sponsored by: Teleport — Secure, Govern, and Operate AI at Engineering Scale. Learn more

not exactly a coherent narrative, is it?

[1]: https://bsky.app/profile/simonwillison.net

simonw · 22 days ago
You know I helped popularize "slop"? I get credited by Wikipedia as an "early champion": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_slop

Dead Comment

Dead Comment