Readit News logoReadit News
tptacek · a month ago
These kinds of suits are so common that directors and officers of large corporations all carry insurance against them --- is there something particularly notable about this suit?
1vuio0pswjnm7 · a month ago
"The lawsuit is considered the first of its kind to go to trial that alleges that board members consciously failed to oversee their company."

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/company-news/2025/07/16...

https://www.klgates.com/The-Continued-Evolution-of-Caremark-...

IMO, also notable because of who is scheduled to testify.

Unless I am missing something, I don't think Zuckerberg has ever been questioned under oath in court.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/22/facebook-settles-class-actio...

marshray · a month ago
It discusses HN-adjacent VCs, Delaware business law, and "Big Tech" and government regulation.

But, yeah, the $8B in question hardly seems existential to FB.

tptacek · a month ago
Oh, yeah, no, I totally get why a serious lawsuit against Facebook execs would be on-topic for HN! I'm more asking, doesn't Facebook see a lawsuit like this like once a quarter?
bawolff · a month ago
IANAL, but this case sounds like the extremest of long shots to me. Does anyone who knows about this sort of thing have any idea how likely such a lawsuit is to suceede?
aaroninsf · a month ago
I'm cynical enough to think that this, too, will result in a payout of some kind. Whatever it might be called.

Companies like this are too big to be held accountable. Every problem is soluble given their capitalization, the only consequence is irritation and fighting—usually among those already complicit and merely concerned that they didn't maximize their view—of interest to few.

Meanwhile, Rome is burning. Oh well.

v5v3 · a month ago
Meta are not involved.

Individuals directors are being sued, not the company

yogurtboy · a month ago
Does anybody with knowledge of the process know if this can be a path to holding companies liable for the private data they save?
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF · a month ago
You would have to be a shareholder (which you probably are if you have a 401k) and you would have to show that their decision to save and use private data has hurt their enterprise such that they would have been more profitable and/or grown more/faster had they not done so.
boringg · a month ago
How many shareholders are leading this? It better not be someone who owns one share that they didn't even hold for that long....
1vuio0pswjnm7 · a month ago
As one might expect Zuckerberg has now reached a settlement with the plaintiffs. Andreesen was scheduled to take the stand today. As in 2017, Andreesen and Zuckerberg have avoided having to answer questions in a courtroom under oath. By settling at the 11th hour.

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment