Look at the top startups founded in the last couple of years, nearly every founder seems to come from an Ivy League school, Stanford, or MIT, often with a perfect GPA. Why is that? Does being academically brilliant matter more than being a strong entrepreneur in the tech world?
Team A: Ivy leaguers with an unknown idea/product
OR
Team B: No name people with an unknown idea/product or even a reasonable idea but too early to prove scale for VC funding.
So even though YC (and other VCs) doesn't reject people that not Ivy Leaguers (many have been funded), the bar is much higher for those people. It is the unfortunate reality. I personally don't see anything wrong with that. Every VC wants to maximize their chance of success in investing in startups which is already a gamble.
Is that true? If I were to comb through recent YC batches, the startups would be dominated by Ivy+ grads or dropouts?
Or are you talking about VC-funded startups and those covered by startup media?
Even if we assumed that there was nothing special about the capabilities of people who finish Ivy League educations, that's still a powerful effect. Add in that they are either competitive enough or have well connected enough families to get into said school, and it's a multiplying effect on top.
The schools are super selective for people who are smart and can execute the strategy to get in, which is similar to sone aspects of the types of business VC want to incubate.