I think the point is that we accept that making something cheaper or easier tends to increase its usage on the margin. The reverse effect is an extraordinary claim that should be met with skepticism. Individual success stories shouldn't be enough to persuade you.
If a small number of people do drugs who wouldn’t have before, but a large number of people who are addicts manage to get clean or no longer die, then is this a win? This post, in my opinion, completely ignores the idea that a government program might be nuanced.
This satire seems misplaced, since the drugs are not coming from a government and are not free. Perhaps a better satirical article would result from actually understanding the topic under consideration.
Readit News
But I wonder about "Designated drunk driving lanes". How would the drunk drivers stay on that lane? :-)
Deleted Comment