Some good advice, but a lot of stuff is just weird or robotic and it has some surprisingly judgmental comments.
The gender page is just strange, most of those sounds so american or old fashioned.
edit: sources are mostly old, there are no sources from less than 10 years which is bad if you're trying to describe current social behaviors, the average source on the gender page is from 2002...
> The rules are indeed stated in a robotic, and somewhat patronizing way, as if written by a mild aspie to teach a stronger aspie the rules.
Doesn't is kind of have to be? That "curse of knowledge" thing makes it kind of hard to explain things to people who's skill on whatever topic is more than a level or two below your own.
> As you note, most of them are generally true though
Not really, it's so mixed that I wouldnt advise a neurodivergent person to follow them, how would you know which one is good?
I don't think the author is sympathetic to autistic people:
"If you engage in less socially acceptable self-stimulatory behaviors that involve clenched muscles, quick jerky movements, rocking, or vocalizations, strangers will likely be afraid to talk to you, and even people you already know may be embarrassed to be with you in public."
You shouldn't be with people that are embarrassed to be with you, as those behaviors are usually not controllable, this is terrible.
in the leadership program, they teach us that if your presence, or aura, isn't steady, nothing else matters. when it is, you find your own charisma, and that's when you can truly be yourself. you can be fun, direct, indirect, extroverted, or introverted—it doesn't matter. but the key is consistency. you need to remain the same in every situation, with every person, and that’s the hard part. this is why attractive people seem to effortlessly navigate any social interaction. in reality, they don't feel like they need to change much at all.
A key thing any senior leader usually learn is that you MUST adapt your behavior in front of the audience, depending on the audience. People won't react to your "charisma" the same way, and being consistent isn't a necessity.
Anyone who worked with a charismatic leader (from Steve Jobs to Adam Neumann) will tell you they wear many faces, depending on the setting, and they're usually different (so not a "true self").
in the leadership program, they teach us that if your presence, or aura, isn't steady, nothing else matters.
My only guess is that statements like this ring true for someone who is having the experience of being successful socially. However, they seem completely useless to someone trying to change their behavior in order to be socially successful.
In the form of advice for people trying to get better at social stuff: fake confidence and relaxation, in the full confidence that it quickly becomes true. I'm probably a mild case, but once I got it, this worked for me.
(That, and it's helpful to have a few canned entry and exit lines. Knowing you can break off a conversation if it gets awkward or stalls makes it less scary to start one. Even just a version of, "well, it was nice to meet you, I'm going to move along now", in whatever phrasing sounds right from you)
I think it's interesting how this makes a distinction about what Americans do, because appropriate social interaction is significantly influenced by culture. I wonder if there's a study or something that explored the variations in social interaction norms across cultures.
There's many interesting books on the subject - "the culture map" is a fun and easy read, covering examples on various cultures (and how to create a more welcoming environment by being aware that differences exist)
This all reads quite basic. I find, breaking the ice is the hardest part. But even before that, the social norm that dedicates that ones should not bother strangers is the hardest to overcome.
I can't read the article as I'm on my phone but would have been interested. As a Founder of a small B2B SaaS company I am often at events where I know almost no people where I would like to get to know lots of people.
It's probably blindingly obvious to others but the following rules have served me well.
1. Never approach a group that is evenly distributed around a circle. So if 2 people are opposite or 4 or a square don't engage. Do multiple loops until you find a group you can approach.
2. Have a good magic trick. I have a very nice one that involves a pack of playing cards and then involves a lot of eye contact while I "read your face" to work out the card.
I have found 99% respond yes to "would you like to see a magic trick?". It works equally well on CEOs as it does students.
FWIW, I’d say yes out of politeness (“not really” would make the both of us pretty awkward) but I’d be embarrassed the whole time, while at the same time not giving a damn about whatever the trick is. And having had conversations about magic tricks before, I know that I’m far from the only one.
That being said, if it works for you that’s great! Just pointing out that a yes doesn’t mean success in these situations
Readit News
For a site that is apparently for people with disorders, the accessibility is somewhat appalling.
The gender page is just strange, most of those sounds so american or old fashioned.
edit: sources are mostly old, there are no sources from less than 10 years which is bad if you're trying to describe current social behaviors, the average source on the gender page is from 2002...
As you note, most of them are generally true though, and some just kind of obvious to a high empathy person.
Doesn't is kind of have to be? That "curse of knowledge" thing makes it kind of hard to explain things to people who's skill on whatever topic is more than a level or two below your own.
Not really, it's so mixed that I wouldnt advise a neurodivergent person to follow them, how would you know which one is good?
I don't think the author is sympathetic to autistic people:
"If you engage in less socially acceptable self-stimulatory behaviors that involve clenched muscles, quick jerky movements, rocking, or vocalizations, strangers will likely be afraid to talk to you, and even people you already know may be embarrassed to be with you in public."
You shouldn't be with people that are embarrassed to be with you, as those behaviors are usually not controllable, this is terrible.
Hidden Social Dimensions: Sounds, Words, Turn Taking, Topic Changes, How Much to Say, Storytelling
Attitudes & Emotions: Expressing Emotion, Power and Solidarity, Social Initiation, Showing Interest, Flirting, Polite = Indirect, Sarcasm
Identities: Age, Gender, Dialects
Anyone who worked with a charismatic leader (from Steve Jobs to Adam Neumann) will tell you they wear many faces, depending on the setting, and they're usually different (so not a "true self").
My only guess is that statements like this ring true for someone who is having the experience of being successful socially. However, they seem completely useless to someone trying to change their behavior in order to be socially successful.
(That, and it's helpful to have a few canned entry and exit lines. Knowing you can break off a conversation if it gets awkward or stalls makes it less scary to start one. Even just a version of, "well, it was nice to meet you, I'm going to move along now", in whatever phrasing sounds right from you)
It's probably blindingly obvious to others but the following rules have served me well.
1. Never approach a group that is evenly distributed around a circle. So if 2 people are opposite or 4 or a square don't engage. Do multiple loops until you find a group you can approach.
2. Have a good magic trick. I have a very nice one that involves a pack of playing cards and then involves a lot of eye contact while I "read your face" to work out the card.
I have found 99% respond yes to "would you like to see a magic trick?". It works equally well on CEOs as it does students.
That being said, if it works for you that’s great! Just pointing out that a yes doesn’t mean success in these situations
Deleted Comment
Dead Comment