Readit News logoReadit News
rickcarlino · 2 years ago
I believe BigForth was absorbed into what is now GForth (still maintained). See the GForth “pedigree”: https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/gforth/Docs-html/Ori...
kragen · 2 years ago
afaik gforth doesn't have bigforth's native-code compiler
packetlost · 2 years ago
Probably not, considering it uses gcc as a backend
avindroth · 2 years ago
Forth really changed the way I think. I now take notes in a Forth-like way. Very underexplored.
bwestergard · 2 years ago
Could you say more about what it means to "take notes in a Forth-like way"?
AstroJetson · 2 years ago
Not sure what it means

carrot soup cookies bread butter cart grocery todo

would be one way :-)

pyinstallwoes · 2 years ago
I'd love to see your notes as a sample, please :).
lelanthran · 2 years ago
I think he might mean:

1. Push items onto a stack.

2. Create new stacks (words) for categories of items.

FWIW, I do the same, and use a tool (now using almost exclusively the GUI tool I include in the github repo) to do it.

This is the explanation of the tree-of-stacks method that I am using: https://github.com/lelanthran/frame/blob/master/docs/FrameIn...

(yes yes, it's a slideshow, but until I can make a video, this is a better medium for visualising how it works).

xelxebar · 2 years ago
Forth is super cool for embedded work. The normal dev cycle of build, burn, not work, tweak, build, burn, repeat is quite slow and annoying. It was kind of revolutionary for me to discover Mecrisp[0], which demonstrates how can provide a (fast!) language that also provides a friggin' repl into your hardware.

The ##forth IRC channel on Libera is quite active. Would recommend popping in for anyone interested. The two projects that got me interested in Forth are

1. JonesForth: http://git.annexia.org/?p=jonesforth.git;a=blob;f=jonesforth...

Explanation and motivation for the What and Why of Forth and its implementation. Well, actually, it's actually an implementation in x86 assembly, but the comments are a wonderful exposition and intro into Forth.

2. SmithForth: https://dacvs.neocities.org/SF/

Implementation of Forth in x86-64 opcodes. It's a hand-written ELF that implements a Forth. It's simplicity is absolutely beautiful.

SmithForth is what pushed me over the edge to really start learning x86 assembly and Forth. I started by hand-decompiling the SmithForth binary, which was quite an adventure on its own.

[0]:https://mecrisp.sourceforge.net/

kragen · 2 years ago
you probably can't use amd64 in embedded work, or even i386 these days, but i think 'a friggin' repl into your hardware' is a good explanation of what's appealing about forth
vanderZwan · 2 years ago
I think I posted an almost identical reply to you just a few days ago, but I'm presuming they linked the x86 examples because most people can actually try them without needing said embedded hardware
actionfromafar · 2 years ago
Sure you can, lot's of custom x86 boards with vxWorks on them out there.
sph · 2 years ago
Someone linked to me FreeForth, a Forth that doesn't have any compile / interpret distinction. Everything is compiled, and if run interactively, words are first compiled into anonymous "function" and then run, which has a lot of benefits; such as allowing compile-only words at the REPL.

I haven't heard anyone talk about or recreate this variant, which to me seems a very interesting evolution of the original Forth. Nor has anyone tried to recreate it in something more readable than a thick assembly implementation that's trying to be a little too smart for its own good.

anta40 · 2 years ago
Are there non-embedded Forth use cases these days? I tried almost a year learning Forth due to curiosity and still don't "get" it.

As a HLL guy, for me Lisp is more understandable (well I don't use it for daily work, though). And if I need low level, well there's assembly.

oh_sigh · 2 years ago
On Forth, anyone know how Chuck is doing these days? I haven't seen anything from him in almost a decade.
drivers99 · 2 years ago
I see him in this Silicon Valley Forth Interest Group video call from 2023-12-16: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPqMc4QmUS0

Even better, here's his "fireside chat" from 2023-11-18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jJkyc-raJQ

edit: his blog has a few brief announcements occasionally https://colorforth.github.io/blog.htm

kragen · 2 years ago
thanks, this is wonderful news

sad to see he's running microsoft windows, which i am sure is not running on a ga144, and an iphone

but it's wonderful to see he's still alive and still living in the mountain cabin and still working on colorforth

this is dispiriting:

> forth is a lovely language, but you have to be able to interface with your hardware. i've been doing that for 50 years and i'm tired of it. they keep changing the rules faster than i can learn what they are

i really respect that the most important purpose for his clock app is to tell him when the sky will turn beautiful golden colors

i wonder if it would be more informative for him to stream some live coding rather than just present finished programs, because i feel that the essence of forth is the interactive experience of using it

a surprisingly hardcore tidbit is (53'40") that colorforth context switches between apps by recompiling the new app from source. otoh i guess that's what php and streamlit do too

fizfaz · 2 years ago
He sometimes joins meetings of the Forth 2020-Group. The last one was meeting #40 on Nov. 11. 2023: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M14tCZiEPkg&t=11670s
jhbadger · 2 years ago
He's still listed as chairman at Greenarrays, which makes chips for embedded systems (and a version of Forth is still the official development system for them)

https://www.greenarraychips.com/

lebuffon · 2 years ago
Amazing that this is one person's work.
robomartin · 2 years ago
Having used Forth professionally for about ten years, the language has always held a special place in my heart. I have had the experience (fun!) of implementing Forth from nothing in a couple of processors (6502 and 68K).

While I do think the language is useful in certain domains, the main problem everyone has with it will be finding qualified programmers. I’ve had to convert codebases to C for this reason and, back in the day, made a fair bit of money doing this as a gun for hire.

notamy · 2 years ago
Never mind, I’m blind, please ignore.
sph · 2 years ago
Why? "Source code last change: 31mar2023"
notamy · 2 years ago
Oh, I missed that entirely. I only saw

> Current version is bigFORTH 2.4.0, Minos 1.4.0, from 22mar2010.

NooneAtAll3 · 2 years ago
where does bigFORTH lay on Big Scale?

https://xkcd.com/2130/