Readit News logoReadit News
mmastrac · 2 years ago
gumby · 2 years ago
Fortunately SLIB and SLEB are still in our future. I hope they don't need to resort to SLYB, much less SLOEB and the like.
codetrotter · 2 years ago
> SLOEB

Excuse me, I think you mean “SLÖB”!

Deleted Comment

sedatk · 2 years ago
Huh, thanks to the article, I learned that SLOB's maintainer was Mercurial's creator, Olivia Mackall. I'm in awe of these people who are involved in more than one gigantic project in their lifetime.
GuB-42 · 2 years ago
Maybe you should check Fabrice Bellard then. https://bellard.org/

His best known works include FFMPEG and QEMU, there are many others.

glandium · 2 years ago
Mercurial was created for the same reason git was created, around the same time. So yeah, Olivia Mackall was a kernel hacker at the time.
catiopatio · 2 years ago
Formerly Matt Mackall, if anyone, like me, was confused by the name change.
trufas · 2 years ago
SLUB is a nice story of a simpler implementation winning out, even when SLAB may have been more technically sophisticated.
corbet · 2 years ago
LWN coverage of the LSFMM session that led to this decision: https://lwn.net/Articles/932201/
dathinab · 2 years ago
How does something ends up on the front page which is so uninteresting(1) that both on the site it comes from and here, there isn't a single comment.

(1): Uninteresting but not irrelevant. Like a step in a stair, each step is uninteresting but relevant as missing a step is a huge issue.

ape4 · 2 years ago
How an OS allocates memory is pretty important
astrange · 2 years ago
This detail of an in kernel allocator isn't very important or novel, but Linux changes are easy to report on since they're done in public, so they get articles.
dathinab · 2 years ago
Like I sayed important but uninteresting.

Because this is not about changing how Linux allocates memory.

It's about deprecating a method Linux used in the past but has by default switched away from already in the past.

mat_epice · 2 years ago
Most links here have dozens of points, this (and a couple of others) only has seven. Perhaps a “hot” metric saw a few votes come in quickly and overestimated its general interest. It should fall off the front page very quickly.
brickteacup · 2 years ago
you realize that you can just ignore links you don't find interesting instead of complaining, right? that's what everyone else does. HN is not your own personal link curator
jmholla · 2 years ago
Agreed. I wish the article dove into how SLAB works, why it is being deprecated, and what it's modern equivalent/replacement is. That would've been worth reading.

I clicked a few of the links in the article and the links in those articles and didn't find any of that.

This is just an announcement for those in the know.