Also, what's the deal with the tone of the economist article? In the past I found them terse, detached and aloof, a little bit arrogant. This has the nyt/atlantic feel of someone who fancies themselves an undiscovered future award winner trying to write about the human side and choosing feelings over facts and analysis.
Derek chauvin was born three years after George Floyd, and grew up in Cottage Grove, a suburb of the Twin Cities 20 miles from the corner where one man killed the other
I understand that some journalists write like this, but I'm surprised to see that stile in the economist
But due to being human, I just call myself an Earthling. This despite my heritage being from multiple cultures (8?) from around the world, some of them very long lived within their family trees. If you were to do a full deep dive on my lineage, you would find that my bloodline goes back not just decades, or even centuries, but millenniums. Technically, so too does everyone else who is alive today, for we all came from some line of apes that evolved or another. And that's ignoring all the stuff about Neanderthals and such.
To me, it doesn't matter who you are, what you look like, or where you came from. What you believe is another matter, since there are wrong opinions about many things abound, but I tend to leave that alone; because arguing with idiots is a good way to lose to them when idiocy outnumbers intelligence since the days of the stone age. (With some exceptions thanks to the coincidental silver lining of plagues.)
To me, people who focus solely on race in any fashion, need to stop. Not only is it not rational, but it's divisive. Which is why politicians love using it in some form or another, when we start to get along again; and most intelligent people know that politicians are less trustworthy than some random person on the internet.
Yet we keep falling for their bullshit. Why?
Because we deeply want to belong to something more than just ourselves, I think. And when that thing we belong to is supposedly threatened by another group inside or out of our own group, we fight them.
Doesn't matter which group, it's the same for all.
Now excuse me while I go back to trying to get things put together in my own life so I can make a place for people who think like me where we can escape the rest who obsess about race, colour or creed.
You're all welcome to join me, though it may take some of you time to de-escalate your emotions over these sorts of things.
> Because we deeply want to belong to something more than just ourselves, I think.
I think in most cases it's simpler than that. People go along with this kind of BS because they are afraid of being labeled as racist (and in doing so, ironically perpetuate racism). It's a shortcut that special interest have found so shut down discussion: "you're with us or you're racist (or some other 'phobic'") and people end up going along for the most part
It's reverse psychology as well to some extent, in my opinion. Or rather, reverse politics perhaps? Is that even a term? Maybe it should be.
One way or the other though, I don't see any issue with being wary of racism. What I see issue with, is bringing it up where there is none, or very little compared to the kind of response being given. And so that's where we seem to agree in the part where you speak of the irony of perpetuating it. (Edit: I should cite an example here. Where I lived before moving back to the city, there was very little racism if any at all. Yet the younger generation and some of my peers would act as if there were KKK members lynching people in the streets. Meanwhile, these same people would spout off about all sorts of atrocious things, depending on their ideological bent.)
As for people going along with things for the most part... Yeah, group think is strong with those who can't think for themselves, especially when they are so weak willed that they will not stand up against those who we would have labelled as bullies as kids.
People like to agree with each other, because they often don't like conflict. But ironically, the only way to deal with those who are essentially bullies, is to fight them. Ignoring them doesn't work, because it just lets them get away with it, and then they grow up into being bullies as adults.
I used to argue this point with my parents, teachers and all other adults as a kid, and now I get to say this: I was right, and the rest were wrong. Ignoring bullies doesn't work, you have to teach them their lesson on the level they understand; whether you like it or not.
But I would much rather just let the world burn now, while I sit back on a small farm and enjoy life while it still lasts. Why?
Because this kind of chaos is what starts world wars, and this one coming up will lead to the 4th being fought with sticks and stones if any of us survive.
> People go along with this kind of BS because they are afraid of being labeled as racist
Do you actually know anyone for whom this is true? Afraid of being labeled racist? If you're not racist that strikes me as a crazy thing to obsess over.
Readit News
But due to being human, I just call myself an Earthling. This despite my heritage being from multiple cultures (8?) from around the world, some of them very long lived within their family trees. If you were to do a full deep dive on my lineage, you would find that my bloodline goes back not just decades, or even centuries, but millenniums. Technically, so too does everyone else who is alive today, for we all came from some line of apes that evolved or another. And that's ignoring all the stuff about Neanderthals and such.
To me, it doesn't matter who you are, what you look like, or where you came from. What you believe is another matter, since there are wrong opinions about many things abound, but I tend to leave that alone; because arguing with idiots is a good way to lose to them when idiocy outnumbers intelligence since the days of the stone age. (With some exceptions thanks to the coincidental silver lining of plagues.)
To me, people who focus solely on race in any fashion, need to stop. Not only is it not rational, but it's divisive. Which is why politicians love using it in some form or another, when we start to get along again; and most intelligent people know that politicians are less trustworthy than some random person on the internet.
Yet we keep falling for their bullshit. Why?
Because we deeply want to belong to something more than just ourselves, I think. And when that thing we belong to is supposedly threatened by another group inside or out of our own group, we fight them.
Doesn't matter which group, it's the same for all.
Now excuse me while I go back to trying to get things put together in my own life so I can make a place for people who think like me where we can escape the rest who obsess about race, colour or creed.
You're all welcome to join me, though it may take some of you time to de-escalate your emotions over these sorts of things.
> Because we deeply want to belong to something more than just ourselves, I think.
I think in most cases it's simpler than that. People go along with this kind of BS because they are afraid of being labeled as racist (and in doing so, ironically perpetuate racism). It's a shortcut that special interest have found so shut down discussion: "you're with us or you're racist (or some other 'phobic'") and people end up going along for the most part
It's reverse psychology as well to some extent, in my opinion. Or rather, reverse politics perhaps? Is that even a term? Maybe it should be.
One way or the other though, I don't see any issue with being wary of racism. What I see issue with, is bringing it up where there is none, or very little compared to the kind of response being given. And so that's where we seem to agree in the part where you speak of the irony of perpetuating it. (Edit: I should cite an example here. Where I lived before moving back to the city, there was very little racism if any at all. Yet the younger generation and some of my peers would act as if there were KKK members lynching people in the streets. Meanwhile, these same people would spout off about all sorts of atrocious things, depending on their ideological bent.)
As for people going along with things for the most part... Yeah, group think is strong with those who can't think for themselves, especially when they are so weak willed that they will not stand up against those who we would have labelled as bullies as kids.
And then there is stuff like this: https://jamesclear.com/why-facts-dont-change-minds
People like to agree with each other, because they often don't like conflict. But ironically, the only way to deal with those who are essentially bullies, is to fight them. Ignoring them doesn't work, because it just lets them get away with it, and then they grow up into being bullies as adults.
I used to argue this point with my parents, teachers and all other adults as a kid, and now I get to say this: I was right, and the rest were wrong. Ignoring bullies doesn't work, you have to teach them their lesson on the level they understand; whether you like it or not.
But I would much rather just let the world burn now, while I sit back on a small farm and enjoy life while it still lasts. Why?
Because this kind of chaos is what starts world wars, and this one coming up will lead to the 4th being fought with sticks and stones if any of us survive.
Being correct is so awesome... (sarcasm)
Do you actually know anyone for whom this is true? Afraid of being labeled racist? If you're not racist that strikes me as a crazy thing to obsess over.
It's a neo-Nazi White supremacist myth that the White population is declining! It's not happening but I'm glad that it is!
No way this doesn't get [flagged] by the end of the night.
Deleted Comment
Dead Comment
Dead Comment