Readit News logoReadit News
cookiecaper · 14 years ago
It'd've been advantageous to see this go on a purely open service like Gitorious instead. They often provide similar features as GitHub and could definitely use the exposure of Linus's account.

I use and enjoy GitHub, so this definitely isn't a personal gripe, I'd just like to see the competition in that space heat up a bit, and there'd be bonus points if we could simultaneously promote a completely open platform.

herTTTz · 14 years ago
Why github Linus?

"[...] it was just the first one that came up when I googled for "git hosting". I've not tried any of the hosting places before, so it was a random choice."

(I don't know how to link a comment in google+, it's in https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/PVZDD2N3... )

damncabbage · 14 years ago
You can link to comments, but you have to go source-diving for the containing div's ID; it doesn't appear to be exposed in the interface anywhere:

https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/PVZDD2N3...

Edit: I take it back. It's completely screwed. There's a # in the ID, and it though it works when you add the fragment to the URL in the address bar while you're viewing the page, visiting the link afresh makes it explode.

Nice work, chaps. :-|

augustl · 14 years ago
WHen I google "git hosting", the first hit is git.kernel.org, then two stack overflow posts, then Gitorious, then GitHub. I wonder what my account contains that makes Google think Gitorious is more important to me.
pmarin · 14 years ago
I am curious to know which one has contributed more to the open source scene. Github has released many non trivial code of its backend and popularized the use of git outside the Linux kernel.
jannes · 14 years ago
In a way github has contributed more to open source, because they host more open source repositories. They act as a catalyst for open source.
veyron · 14 years ago
Can you explain what exactly is closed with github that is open with gitorious? (I confess lack of familiarity with both)
bostonvaulter2 · 14 years ago
Gitorious's web front-end is entirely open source (but a huge pain to setup) but Github's web front-end is proprietary (although they open source many of their backend libraries).
thedjpetersen · 14 years ago
The problem with Github being completely open source is that no one would pay for the service part of it, which is the only way it can exist.
SkyMarshal · 14 years ago
Gitorious exists just fine doing that, they make money off support and consulting, same way most other FOSS projects that make money do it.

http://gitorious.com/

sp332 · 14 years ago
I don't understand your point. Surely people do pay for hosted storage, even when the code is available?
mtogo · 14 years ago
Which is why they charge insanely exorbitant prices for simple git hosting.
cpeterso · 14 years ago
The "torvalds" github account claims to have been created today. Did github have reserve that account name for Linus or did they boot a squatter? I see there dubious accounts registered for "linustorvalds", "billgates", and "stevejobs" but not "billg" or "sjobs".

btw stevejobs uploaded Windows 8 source code in 2009! Bill, you might want to give Steve a call. ;)

jgeralnik · 14 years ago
If you look towards the end of the comment thread on https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/PVZDD2N3..., he created the account since kernel.org is down
skeletonjelly · 14 years ago
/me puts on conspiracy hat

Github hacked kernel.org

moe · 14 years ago
Poor Linus will probably be flooded with patches and pull requests for every commit he makes.

On the other hand, he might very well spark some interesting things just by committing small stubs of his ideas.

yuvadam · 14 years ago
arkx · 14 years ago
Why not fix all the typos if it's as easy as clicking 'edit file'? He has the option to merge it by clicking one button.

I just can't see the downside. He didn't want to merge it due to the lack of signed-off-by, but at least he knows there's a typo there now and can fix it or let it be if it doesn't bother him.

(For the record, this was not the first typo fix contributed, see https://github.com/torvalds/diveclog/pull/2 for something he already pulled in.)

jsaxton86 · 14 years ago
The README file is great: https://github.com/torvalds/diveclog/blob/master/README

TL/DR: I've never used GTK before, I know my code sucks, but my little divelog program is better than anything else I could find, and if someone wants to fix my code they are welcome to do so.

yesbabyyes · 14 years ago
Sorry for taking http://github.com/linus, Linus!
grandalf · 14 years ago
Congrats to the Github team for this. I'd say it's a pretty huge endorsement, regardless of whether Linus intended it that way or not.
lallysingh · 14 years ago
Well, let's wait to see Linus's comments on how he feels about it. If he's unhappy, he'll write about it in public, scathing remarks.
systems · 14 years ago
Well, and knowing Linus, few months from today he will probably get frustrated by some limitation and write his own Git front end (that everyone will start using) and it will be a better front end

The question is which platform would Linus use for a web front end?

NARKOZ · 14 years ago
like Zed Shaw? :)
xuhu · 14 years ago
Hard to believe, but the sources compile cleanly on win32 (using mingw). And ... it actually works!

I put binaries up at http://patraulea.com/diveclog/diveclog-win32-110904.zip