I used it a bit before that (2004-2006) but it was a great resource and then Wikipedia started really coming along. I think that now, however, it is a better resource than wikipedia when I want to double check something because of the simplicity as wikipedia articles have expanded quite a bit even on simple things.
Funny, I've been using the same sort of format for my own notes on physics [1]. Although in my graph there is no semantic meaning between graph nodes, maybe I should add that.
Do you love it purely for nostalgia? Because I loved this as much as you back in the day, but this website could definitely use some improvements to make it more accessible and palatable to students today.
I'd wager all they need to do is get some proper CSS happening and they can visually change things without intrusively changing the HTML content itself. The may need to strip away some deprecated attributes for HTML elements, and add class attributes, but that's about it.
In my case, there is a definite nostalgic bias. I would have used the site near the start of my university studies in 1996. That said, I think there is a case for leaving it as-is. Many sites are designed to be accessible and palatable to students today, so there is some merit to maintaining the original style in case it addresses the needs of people who are not well served by modern sensibilities.
I was keen to explore (even if it's a bit dated) but unfortunately the combination of mobile-browser and dark mode makes a bit of a mess of things.. (making it quite a bumpy ride) I wonder if there are any 'translations' to other formats around?
"Second Law of Thermodynamics: In any cyclic process the entropy will either increase or remain the same."
I need some clarity about what is meant by 'cyclic' here. Is it perhaps to refer to feedback loops/self-sustaining phenomena?
Thanks, had a read and I think I understand approximately. I am still wondering whether biological systems should count as cyclic in this sense too? I think that they seem to, in the returning-to-the-same-state thing, at least across the generations, and even in regular metabolism in some sense - but the law doesn't (intuitively) seem to apply in the biology/evolution case.. it doesn't just diffuse, it can go on in pretty much precisely the same pattern for billions of years it seems? I guess I am probably ignoring something huge about this (like the Sun!?)
I see, thanks. I'm wondering if there might be any good examples of cyclic systems in the natural world too? Both of those devices are complicated, and you'd need to know the operation in detail to be able to connect it with the phases of a state-cycle-diagram.. but maybe something natural might make it easier to understand?
Also, they have for other fields too:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/chemical/chemcon....
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geophys/geophys.h...
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/biology/biocon.ht...
Deleted Comment
1: https://0x5.be/physics-notes/index.html
There's some extra pandoc filtering magic to create hoverable equations.
The svg graphs are autogenerated from markdown links inside of the pages sources.
"Second Law of Thermodynamics: In any cyclic process the entropy will either increase or remain the same."
I need some clarity about what is meant by 'cyclic' here. Is it perhaps to refer to feedback loops/self-sustaining phenomena?
It's a perfect site I've used it when I studied electronics and IT.
https://www.conceptionary.app/