Readit News logoReadit News
in_the_sticks · 9 years ago
Just like a real democracy, some participants are more equal than others.
netgusto · 9 years ago
Looks like there's a revolution going on already https://github.com/chaosbot/chaos/pull/42
sanjaybv · 9 years ago
The pull request for equal voting weights just got accepted!
specialist · 9 years ago
I wonder if any of these experiments support variations. Like different thresholds for different classes of decisions. Simple majority, super majority, consensus (Roman evaluation), etc.

Rate of change matters. Sometimes you want fast (the intent of the US House of Representatives), sometimes slow (amending the USA Constitution).

JetSpiegel · 9 years ago
The electoral college in this case is even less democratic, since user more Github-famous are worth more.
zghst · 9 years ago
Also in a more abstract sense, such as voter blocs and political strongholds...
EGreg · 9 years ago
Just like in a real airport, some passengers are more random than others :)
harryf · 9 years ago
anythingbot · 9 years ago
I updated the video feed and added a synthesizer

anythingbot.org/video

anythingbot.org/nonlanguage

mappum · 9 years ago
Very cool, I really like this idea of Nomic-style open-source code governance. I previously built a similar project: https://github.com/botwillacceptanything/botwillacceptanythi...
pavel_lishin · 9 years ago
It may be possible to mitigate the "create 5000 dummy accounts" attack by steadily increasing the age required to vote, much like in Larry Niven's Struldbrugs Club membership.

Obviously the harshest, most stringent approach would be to block anyone whose account was created after the time of the PR merge. But this would prevent new players from participating.

You could also increase the age requirement by one day every two days, or have a logarithmically increasing requirement.

cdupont · 9 years ago
I am the author of a similar game, called Nomyx: http://www.nomyx.net/ In Nomyx, the players can change the rules of the game, while playing it!
beejiu · 9 years ago
Interesting. I had a similar idea but for 'political policy' rather than code. Basically, a kind of social network where people work on editing a single corpus of text, making 'merge requests' and voting. It used a statistical technique called a sequential probability ratio test to work out whether a user's change should be accepted or rejected. http://brendonboshell.co.uk/voting-system/
schtitt · 9 years ago
It's like the code version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomic !
Gaelan · 9 years ago
There's also a Haskell-based one called Nomyx.
bewuethr · 9 years ago
This looks very similar to https://github.com/botwillacceptanything
anythingbot · 9 years ago
And the activity looks very similar to a neuron firing! This is, in a sense, THE BASIC LEARNING UNIT a.k.a. neuron. If you think about the way water flows through a river (the water KEEPS ERODING THE RIVER! How can this possibly work ?!?!!?) or the way a neuron counts the "votes" from other neurons like an automatic electronic computer, you can see similarities in scale!

If you have any questions, you can send a PR to https://github.com/anythingbot/anythingbot/ or create an issue or ask in a reply here. My email is

anythingbot@anythingbot.org

And there is a video feed.

BWAA TV: Bot Will Accept Anything TV

http://anythingbot.org/video/