Readit News logoReadit News
Posted by u/TravelTechGuy 9 years ago
Ask HN: Could you recommend a charity?
I'm looking to donate a small sum of money. I'm looking for a charity that meets the following criteria:

1. Actually helps people in need.

2. Uses the money you donate towards helping people, not salaries and marketing.

3. Allows donating using PayPal/Google Checkout/Other digital payment option (I just don't trust IT volunteers with keeping my CC safe).

4. And finally, has to be non-naggy (i.e., the fact that I gave once does not mean you can spam my inbox with repeat requests).

Would appreciate your suggestions (and opinions of my criteria).

mtmail · 9 years ago
http://www.givewell.org/ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GiveWell) is in the business of evaluating other charities.

I think on (4) you can only win by using one-off email addresses.

TravelTechGuy · 9 years ago
Not if you use PayPal and they get your email from them.
toomuchtodo · 9 years ago
https://watsi.org

Meets all of your criteria, and 100% of your donation goes directly to providing care for those in need. They are also radically transparent; a google doc link is on their site showing where every dollar is spent.

orlandohill · 9 years ago
Chase Adam's Startup School talk on Watsi is well worth watching.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlT3UhC7NwQ

cbhl · 9 years ago
I've given to Watsi before and gotten follow-up emails, violating criteria 4.

I would recommend having a separate "spam" email address for donations and other such sign-ups.

opendomain · 9 years ago
I second Watsi.

_ 100% _ is given to the people in need

niftich · 9 years ago
To stay meta, 'GiveWell' evaluates charities [1] and produces a small list of recommended charities every year [2].

[1] http://www.givewell.org/how-we-work [2] http://www.givewell.org/charities/top-charities

zcollins · 9 years ago
You should check out effective altruism

https://www.effectivealtruism.org/

Focus on donating to high impact charities that use the money effectively

veddox · 9 years ago
About your first point: Evaluating how effective a charity is can be incredibly tricky, especially when they operate in a culture that's foreign to you. To be able to judge well, you would need to see them in action as well as have a thorough understanding of the situation on the ground. (An approach that worked brilliantly in one place can be the exact wrong thing to do in another situation, for example.)

In my experience, tiny one-project charities often do some of the best work, because they are often closer to the community and the day-to-day life of the people they serve than the big, global charities. Having said that, only the big charities have the necessary resources to tackle the big problems... I guess that's a tension we just have to live with.

BTW, I'm glad to hear you thinking about donating, we need a lot more people who do!

JamesBarney · 9 years ago
I personally donate to the Against Malaria Foundation. There is plenty of evidence that it's an effective charity. It's the top recommended charity from GiveWell. They mentions that you're probably giving someone's son/daughter/brother/sister an extra year of life for every $70-$100.(hell of a deal if you ask me)

http://www.givewell.org/charities/against-malaria-foundation

DanBC · 9 years ago
Gloucestershire Young Carers.

A carer is someone who provides care for someone, but who is not paid to do so. The person getting care is normally disabled, and often a relative. A young carer is someone under the age of 18.

These children face significant amounts of ignorance, not just from student colleagues but also from some teachers.

And they face tricky problems. When a child reaches 17 - 18, and is thinking about going to university they feel guilt about leaving their cared for person, and also about putting younger siblings into the caring role.

I recommend the Gloucestershire branch because they're closest to me, but there are others around the UK.

Here's their website: http://www.glosyoungcarers.org.uk/

Here's their twitter feed: https://twitter.com/Glosyoungcarers

I'm not sure they meet your criteria for option 3, but I'm sure they can work something out.

(I have no connection to this charity. I don't work for them, and I don't get any service from them.)

Alex3917 · 9 years ago
> Uses the money you donate towards helping people, not salaries and marketing.

How exactly do you intend to spend money helping people if not paying salaries? Any time you spend money you're paying for either a product or service, and either way that money goes for paying people's salaries. (Unless you just want to give money to people directly as basic income or whatever.)

mtmail · 9 years ago
There are charities that get their base costs covered by yet other investors and can claim 100% of donations go to the cause. https://www.charitywater.org/100percent/ for example has fancy New York offices they can use for free.
TravelTechGuy · 9 years ago
Thanks mtmail! I spent the last 20 minutes reading their material, disclosures, and the Charity Navigator review (https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summar...) - and decided to donate to them. You made my day!
Alex3917 · 9 years ago
Don't they pay people to dig wells and/or buy folks the tools to do so?
cuchoi · 9 years ago
This is a good read about the topic: http://overheadmyth.com/

"In 2013, GuideStar, BBB Wise Giving Alliance, and Charity Navigator wrote an open letter to the donors of America in a campaign to end the Overhead Myth—the false conception that financial ratios are the sole indicator of nonprofit performance. For our second letter, released in October 2014, we invite the nonprofits of America to do their part to focus donors’ attention on what really matters: your organization’s efforts to make the world a better place. We ask nonprofits and the social sector at large to join us as we move toward an Overhead Solution."