There were many more juicy bits in that case, but this part is somewhat in the context of the discussion. The message seemed to be, plan better next time :)
Was being interviewed by a panel of 4-5 people. The main guy, who I presume was the hiring manager stood up in the middle of the interview and left the room, seemingly unimpressed with my answers.
Thankfully I didn't get through and heard many horror stories regarding their culture in later years.
Any mental performance ascribed to caffeine in studies is always due to removing withdrawal symptoms. It doesn't increase them past their baseline.
In addition, caffeine works by stressing the body, thus reducing creative problem solving capabilities.
So, really if you quit caffeine, your performance might suffer for a few days, then it'd be back up to 100% or even higher.
I don't use caffeine (though I love coffee, it does not love me) I do use smallish dose Adderall XR for my ADHD, but even then I reduce/stop it when I need to be creative (architecture/design of complicated systems). For me, Adderall is great for slamming out repetitive tasks, it reduces my capacity for lateral thinking.
I can think of some with one or two of those attributes but not many that match it all the way around.
They are the kind of people who are in majority in HN. They have similar views and when they comment here on HN their views are accepted and prompted more readily.
This makes it a kind of an echo chamber.
All deviants get banned or their comments are greyed out.
Dissenting is not allowed and dealt with severity and finality.