What a strange and thought provoking statement.
― Robert A. Heinlein
Especially if it can operate very quietly, one fairly slow robot could do probably all the housework, and could do it at night when it's literally out of sight and out of mind. It would feel like magic. You'd wake up every morning to a clean house and hot breakfast.
Coming downstairs in the morning to a completely clean floor is definitely a tiny bit of that magic.
I realize I will not be able to buy a car with no screens due to the backup camera rules. But there is actual safety value in that for me so I’m ok with it.
What do cars specifically positively provide? NOT including the positives that exists due to constructing infrastructure around that mode of transportation (artificial issues).
Speaking from the Netherlands with a relatively good public transit system.
Loading parent story...
Loading comment...
I expect the industry realizes 6k is basically the stopping point so they're intentionally approaching it very slowly.
Edit: Updated with ppi specs to draw focus to pixel density of desktop displays.
I'm working on a 27" 2560x1440 screen. I can see pixels, but that really doesn't matter. Text is readable, nothing is blurry, I can do my work and get on with my day. Screens are good enough, they work, and there is not much to gain by having higher resolutions.
Why the constant obsession to apply a technology designed for a specific purpose everywhere else, even when it doesn't make sense?
Unless you have a background in C/C++ already, most people can probably get up and running with something like this way, way faster.