We have been pretty well informed of Musk's shenanigans in Portugal. His sieg heil spread pretty quickly.

Ben Felix recounts Buffett's answer to this in 2019:

https://youtu.be/32SnTUtdsOI?t=557

It looks great. But it's missing one critical feature of "fast-food" apps like TikTok: the content is not easily digestible. Which is understandable, because scientific papers are dense.

Maybe a good idea would be to parse the abstract through an LLM to make it more understandable (maybe caching the results so it's not expensive)? Maybe also using some standard style, like starting with a couple of "dumbed-down" sentences of the article for the non-expert, and progressively explaining better.

Good read. It is also refreshing to read how Schrödinger came up with his equation even if it was not clear how to interpret it.

He was attempting to formalize de Broglie's "particles as waves" concept, which, according to the article, "could obtain the quantization rules of Niels Bohr and Sommerfeld by demanding that an integer number of waves should be fitted along a stationary orbit."

Schrödinger's equation put that claim on firm mathematical grounds. It gave correct predictions. But just what this new "wave function" was remained up to interpretation.

I don't know about this book, but I highly recommend "Linear Algebra Done Right" by the same author. It is a very clear presentation of Linear Algebra. Although I would recommend it for someone who already took a first course on it.

Does this handle elimination of variables in a polynomial system (using an eliminating order for Groebner basis)?

This is a visualization of what the states of a qubit can look like in two different physical systems (particle spin / photon polarization). Despite their differences, they can be described using the same mathematical object: a unit vector, here represented on the famous Bloch sphere.