I mean, wouldn't sensitivity be the default assumption? Why were they otherwise convinced?
I mean, wouldn't sensitivity be the default assumption? Why were they otherwise convinced?
Also, multiplying prime numbers is now illegal.
edit: Downvotes are funny because we are almost certainly going to see laws passed in the next few years that are functionally equivalent to the rules stated above.
Deleted Comment
https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp
Any other recommendations?
> The Mayor will also be initiating a “Key to NYC Pass,” which is like the Covid-19 passport talked about a few months ago. It's a carrot-and-stick approach, as people will be required to show that they are vaccinated if they want to go to restaurants, gyms and other events. No vaccinations, no entrance. “If you want to participate in society fully, you’ve got to get vaccinated,” de Blasio proclaimed. “If we’re going to stop the Delta variant, the time is now,” said the mayor. “This is going to make clear, you want to enjoy everything great in this summer of New York City? Go get vaccinated.”
> In an interview with MSNBC, de Blasio dialed up his frustration over the unvaccinated. “We’ve got to shake people at this point and say, ‘Come on now.’ We tried voluntary. We could not have been more kind and compassionate. Free testing, everywhere you turn, incentives, friendly, warm embrace. The voluntary phase is over,” de Blasio said last week. “It’s time for mandates, because it’s the only way to protect our people.”
De Blasio is talking about restricting access to entirely optional events and locations based on vaccine status, not mandating anyone get it or else.
In Australia you can see the next step already where it’s being applied to grocery stores. You have to start pushing back before it gets to that.
I think this is a reasonable message of caution when talking about someone pushing HCQ and drinking bleach on the daily.
“If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the Doctors, tell us we should take it, I'll be the first in line to take it, absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it I'm not taking it.“
Note “But if…”. That programmers aren’t able to parse this if else statement is concerning.
They would say “it’s not FDA approved!” not as the core of their hesitancy, but because they were trying to be appeal to pro-vax peoples decision making framework.
I don’t think we should be able to require them to.
To many of you here: imagine the Trump admin trying to require you to take the vaccine in November of last year. Cities would have burned over it.
And honestly: I was one of the first to take it, but the desire to almost force me to take a booster, and the weird, Orwellian ways that the government talks about it, has turned me against the booster.
It ends up feeling less like the decisions are guided by science and more like they’re guided by petty tyrants wanting to control what others do.
Anybody who has ever lived under an HOA will recognize this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dAjCeMuXR0
The same thing was broadly expressed on twitter at the time too, she was far from alone in that sentiment.
Deleted Comment
> For the first time that I am aware of, we are seeing clusters of people seeking voluntary amputations of healthy limbs and performing amputations on themselves.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/12/a-new-w...
That was in 2000 and since then it's only increased in scale. Tumblr alone saw widespread suicidal ideation, depression, self-harm and a host of identity crises.
Now the question is, what's the solution?